U.S. Right to Know v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
| U.S. Right to Know |
| U.S. Department of Health and Human Services |
| 3:2021cv08056 |
| October 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel by Michael A. Keough (Keough, Michael) (Filed on 12/10/2021) |
| Filing 19 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by U.S. Right to Know.. (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 11/23/2021) |
| Filing 18 CLERKS NOTICE Re Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge was due on 10/28/2021. It was not received by the Court. Plaintiff(s) shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 11/30/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2021) |
| Filing 17 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.. (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 11/23/2021) |
Filing 16
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #15 Motion for Pro Hac Vice re Daniel Snyder. (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2021)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16633028.) filed by U.S. Right to Know. (Snyder, Daniel) (Filed on 11/16/2021) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #13 Stipulation to continue time for defendant to respond to complaint. Extension to respond by: 12/30/2021. (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2021)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Responsive Pleading Deadline filed by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Savith Iyengar)(Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 11/9/2021) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by U.S. Right to Know (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by U.S. Right to Know (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by U.S. Right to Know (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 U.S. Attorney, #2 U.S. Attorney General)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2021) |
| Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/6/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/13/2022 10:00 AM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2021) |
| Filing 7 EXHIBITS re #1 Complaint Exhibit A (FOIA Request) filed byU.S. Right to Know. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 10/14/2021) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/28/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2021) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 10/14/2021) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 10/14/2021) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 10/14/2021) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by U.S. Right to Know (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 10/14/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Right to Know ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16497906.). Filed byU.S. Right to Know. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 10/14/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U.S. Right to Know v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: U.S. Right to Know | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Susanna Doughty |
| Represented By: | Daniel C Snyder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Keough |
| Represented By: | Savith Iyengar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
