Stanic v. Orthofix US LLC et al
Plaintiff: Christophe Stanic
Defendant: Orthofix US LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Inc., German Spine Specialists, My Spine Solution, Ken Hiebert and Orthopadisch Neurochirugisches Zentum
Case Number: 3:2021cv08063
Filed: October 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Maxine M Chesney
Referring Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
2 Judge: Lucy H Koh
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2022 Filing 24 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Christophe Stanic (Kronenberg, Steven) (Filed on 1/14/2022)
January 13, 2022 Filing 23 ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2022)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 10, 2022. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2022)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Caseload Rebalancing Judge no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/6/22. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cfe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2022)
January 6, 2022 Filing 20 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (cfe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2022)
January 5, 2022 Filing 19 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Orthofix US LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Inc... (Tabura, Richard) (Filed on 1/5/2022)
January 5, 2022 Filing 18 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Christophe Stanic.. (Kronenberg, Steven) (Filed on 1/5/2022)
December 17, 2021 Filing 17 You are receiving this Notice because this case has been assigned to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh. On December 13, 2021, Judge Koh was confirmed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The parties to this action are instructed to meet and confer to determine if collectively they will consent to transfer of this case to a Magistrate Judge for all purposes. On or before January 5, 2022, each party must file either (1) written consent to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge or (2) a request for reassignment of this case to a district judge. The parties may consent to the jurisdiction of a specific Magistrate Judge regardless of the division of the Court to which that Judge is assigned. In the event that the parties decline consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will be randomly reassigned to a district judge who likely will not be resident in the San Jose division of the Court. ON BEHALF OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, Richard Seeborg, Chief Judge. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ecg-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2021)
December 9, 2021 Filing 16 STIPULATION To Enlarge Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Orthofix US LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Inc.. (Wittlake, Katherine) (Filed on 12/9/2021)
November 29, 2021 Filing 15 STIPULATION to Enlarge Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Orthofix US LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Inc.. (Tabura, Richard) (Filed on 11/29/2021)
November 4, 2021 Filing 14 STIPULATION To Enlarge Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Orthofix US LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Inc.. (Tabura, Richard) (Filed on 11/4/2021)
November 2, 2021 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH. Following the case reassignment to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for February 2, 2022 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. The Joint Case Management Statement is due seven days prior to the Initial Case Management Conference. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ked, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2021)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins assigned for Discovery purposes only. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by clerk on 11/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2021)
October 28, 2021 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2021)
October 28, 2021 Filing 10 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Christophe Stanic. (Kronenberg, Steven) (Filed on 10/28/2021)
October 28, 2021 Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Orthofix US LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Inc.. (Tabura, Richard) (Filed on 10/28/2021)
October 28, 2021 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Orthofix US LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Inc... (Tabura, Richard) (Filed on 10/28/2021)
October 27, 2021 Filing 7 Response to Order to Show Cause #6 Order to Show Cause, Why Case Should Not Be Remanded byOrthofix US LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard Tabura, #2 Exhibit 1-4 to Declaration of Richard Tabura)(Tabura, Richard) (Filed on 10/27/2021)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Court ORDERS Orthofix to show cause in writing why this case should not be remanded by 10/27/2021. The Court also reminds all parties to consent or decline the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge by 10/28/2021. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 10/20/2021. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2021)
October 15, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Orthofix US LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Inc. re #3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, #4 Certificate of Interested Entities, #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Standing Orders (Wittlake, Katherine) (Filed on 10/15/2021)
October 14, 2021 Filing 4 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Orthofix US LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Orthofix Medical Inc. for Orthofix US LLC; Corporate Parent Orthofix US LLC for Spinal Kinetics, Inc.. (Wittlake, Katherine) (Filed on 10/14/2021)
October 14, 2021 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/5/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/12/2022 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2021)
October 14, 2021 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/28/2021. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2021)
October 14, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Defendants Orthofix US LLC, Formerly Orthofix Inc., and Spinal Kinetics, Inc.'s Notice of Removal from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 21CV382461. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16498975). Filed bySpinal Kinetics, Inc., Orthofix US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wittlake, Katherine) (Filed on 10/14/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stanic v. Orthofix US LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christophe Stanic
Represented By: Anthony Lawrence Label
Represented By: Steven Aaron Kronenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Orthofix US LLC
Represented By: Katherine Michelle Wittlake
Represented By: Ginger Florence Heyman Pigott
Represented By: Richard Reynaldo Tabura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spinal Kinetics, Inc.
Represented By: Katherine Michelle Wittlake
Represented By: Ginger Florence Heyman Pigott
Represented By: Richard Reynaldo Tabura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: German Spine Specialists
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: My Spine Solution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ken Hiebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Orthopadisch Neurochirugisches Zentum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?