Brown v. Gordon et al
| Daniel P Brown and Daniel P. Brown |
| Jock Gordon and MindOnly Pty Ltd |
| 3:2021cv08098 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 REPLY (re #18 MOTION to Dismiss CORRECTION OF DOCKET #17 ) filed byJock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Luke A. Toop, #2 Exhibit One)(Linke, Derek) (Filed on 12/13/2021) |
| Filing 25 CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING. To avoid a hearing on 12/30/2021, the court advances the hearing date to 12/23/2021 at 9:30 a.m., particularly because the jurisdictional issue probably precedes the arbitration issue. Motion Hearing #18 MOTION to Dismiss CORRECTION OF DOCKET #17 previously set for 12/30/2021 is reset to 12/23/2021 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2021) Modified on 12/13/2021 (ejk, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 24 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler: Motion Hearing held via Zoom on 12/9/2021. Matters are argued, submitted and taken under submission. Court to issue order. Total Time in Court: 13 minutes. Zoom Webinar Recording Time: 11:21 - 11:34. Plaintiff's Attorney: William John Rogers. Defendants' Attorneys: Derek Linke and Derek Alan Newman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 12/9/2021) |
| Filing 23 Declaration of Jock Gordon in Support of #6 Declaration in Support, Motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings filed byJock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Related document(s) #6 ) (Lieberman, Stevan) (Filed on 12/9/2021) |
Filing 22
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #21 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Stevan Lieberman representing Defendants. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2021)
|
| Filing 21 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number BCANDC-16703223.) filed by Jock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd. (Lieberman, Stevan) (Filed on 12/9/2021) |
| Filing 20 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #18 MOTION to Dismiss CORRECTION OF DOCKET #17 ) filed byDaniel P. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Daniel Brown in opposition, #2 Declaration Declaration of Gretchen Nelson in opposition)(Rogers, William) (Filed on 12/6/2021) |
| Filing 19 Declaration of Jock Gordon in Support of #18 MOTION to Dismiss CORRECTION OF DOCKET #17 CORRECTION OF DOCKET # [18-1] filed byJock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Related document(s) #18 ) (Linke, Derek) (Filed on 11/22/2021) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss CORRECTION OF DOCKET #17 filed by Jock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd. Motion Hearing set for 12/30/2021 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 12/6/2021. Replies due by 12/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jock Gordon. See #19 ., #2 Proposed Order)(Linke, Derek) (Filed on 11/22/2021) Modified on 11/23/2021 (wsn, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 17 CORRECTED MOTION FILED AT #18 . MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd. Motion Hearing set for 12/30/2021 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 12/6/2021. Replies due by 12/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jock Gordon See #19 , #2 Proposed Order)(Linke, Derek) (Filed on 11/22/2021) Modified on 11/23/2021 (wsn, COURT STAFF). Modified on 11/23/2021 (wsn, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 16 REPLY (re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings ) filed byJock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Declaration of Jock Gordon, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Supplemental Declaration of Stevan H. Lieberman, #7 Exhibit A)(Linke, Derek) (Filed on 11/19/2021) |
| Filing 15 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings ) filed byDaniel P. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Daniel P. Brown, #2 Declaration Gretchen Nelson, #3 Declaration Richard M Glantz Esq)(Rogers, William) (Filed on 11/12/2021) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filed byDaniel P. Brown. (Rogers, William) (Filed on 11/6/2021) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Daniel P. Brown.. (Rogers, William) (Filed on 11/6/2021) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/8/2021. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd.. (Linke, Derek) (Filed on 10/29/2021) |
| Filing 10 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by MindOnly Pty Ltd (Linke, Derek) (Filed on 10/29/2021) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Jock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd (Linke, Derek) (Filed on 10/29/2021) |
| Filing 8 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Motion Hearing #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings set for 12/9/2021 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/l b General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There i s no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2021) |
| Filing 7 Declaration of Stevan H. Lieberman in Support of #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed byJock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Related document(s) #5 ) (Linke, Derek) (Filed on 10/29/2021) |
| Filing 6 Declaration of Jock Gordon in Support of #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed byJock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Related document(s) #5 ) (Linke, Derek) (Filed on 10/29/2021) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by Jock Gordon, MindOnly Pty Ltd. Motion Hearing set for 12/9/2021 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 11/12/2021. Replies due by 11/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Linke, Derek) (Filed on 10/29/2021) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/6/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/13/2022 11:00 AM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2021) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/1/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2021) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by MindOnly Pty Ltd . (Linke, Derek) (Filed on 10/18/2021) |
| #Electronic filing error. Please resubmit current Civil Cover Sheet Rev.10/21 from our website www.cand.uscourts.gov. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by MindOnly Pty Ltd (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA, County of San Francisco. Their case number is CGC-21-594406. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16504283). Filed byMindOnly Pty Ltd. (Attachments: #1 copy of Complaint attached - Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Linke, Derek) (Filed on 10/15/2021) Modified on 10/18/2021 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
