Davis v. Alameda County Superior Court
| La Choy Davis |
| Alameda County Superior Court |
| 3:2021cv08207 |
| October 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Robert M Illman |
| PSLC MBI |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by La Choy Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2021) Modified on 12/6/2021 (ecg, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 11/16/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by La Choy Davis.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2021) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2021) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE: re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 11/29/2021. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Under the Prisoner Civil Rights Act against Alameda County Superior Court (Filing fee IFPP). Filed by La Choy Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Alameda County Superior Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: La Choy Davis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Alameda County Superior Court | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
