Wetton v. DSP Group, Inc. et al
| Elizabeth Wetton |
| DSP Group, Inc., Ofer Elyakim, Kenneth H. Traub, Thomas A. Lacey, Cynthia Paul, Gabi Seligsohn, Yair Seroussi and Norman Taffe |
| 4:2021cv08484 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) by Elizabeth Wetton (Smith, Evan) (Filed on 12/2/2021) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Elizabeth Wetton. Service waived by DSP Group, Inc. waiver sent on 11/3/2021, answer due 1/2/2022; Ofer Elyakim waiver sent on 11/3/2021, answer due 1/2/2022; Thomas A. Lacey waiver sent on 11/3/2021, answer due 1/2/2022; Cynthia Paul waiver sent on 11/3/2021, answer due 1/2/2022; Yair Seroussi waiver sent on 11/3/2021, answer due 1/2/2022; Norman Taffe waiver sent on 11/3/2021, answer due 1/2/2022; Kenneth H. Traub waiver sent on 11/3/2021, answer due 1/2/2022. (Smith, Evan) (Filed on 11/16/2021) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE.Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for February 8, 2022, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. Case Management Statement due by February 1st. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:21-cv-08484-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2021) |
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 11/2/21. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2021)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2021) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to DSP Group, Inc., Ofer Elyakim, Thomas A. Lacey, Cynthia Paul, Gabi Seligsohn, Yair Seroussi, Norman Taffe, Kenneth H. Traub. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2021) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Elizabeth Wetton.. (Smith, Evan) (Filed on 11/2/2021) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons. (Smith, Evan) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/27/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/3/2022 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/15/2021. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| Filing 4 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Elizabeth Wetton as to DSP Group, Inc., Ofer Elyakim, Thomas A. Lacey, Cynthia Paul, Gabi Seligsohn, Yair Seroussi, Norman Taffe, Kenneth H. Traub. (Smith, Evan) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Elizabeth Wetton F.R.C.P. 7.1 Disclosure Statement (Smith, Evan) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Elizabeth Wetton (Smith, Evan) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Civil Cover Sheet against DSP Group, Inc., Ofer Elyakim, Thomas A. Lacey, Cynthia Paul, Gabi Seligsohn, Yair Seroussi, Norman Taffe, Kenneth H. Traub ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-16573979.). Filed byElizabeth Wetton. (Smith, Evan) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety as Proposed Summons. Re: #4 Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by Elizabeth Wetton (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
