Strickland v. Urban Alchemy et al
Plaintiff: Shawn Strickland
Defendant: Urban Alchemy and City and County of San Francisco
Case Number: 3:2021cv08718
Filed: November 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Alex G Tse
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2022 Filing 16 Certificate of Interested Entities by Shawn Strickland (Wagda, Donald) (Filed on 1/6/2022)
January 5, 2022 Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint For Damages and Injunctive Relief for Violation of Civil Rights against All Defendants. Filed byShawn Strickland. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Redline Copy per Civil Standing Order for Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse)(Wagda, Donald) (Filed on 1/5/2022)
December 23, 2021 Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Urban Alchemy.. (Anderies, Shane) (Filed on 12/23/2021)
December 23, 2021 Filing 13 Certificate of Interested Entities by Urban Alchemy (Anderies, Shane) (Filed on 12/23/2021)
December 23, 2021 Filing 12 Defendant Urban Alchemy's ANSWER to Complaint byUrban Alchemy. (Anderies, Shane) (Filed on 12/23/2021)
December 22, 2021 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE TO DEFENDANT URBAN ALCHEMY Re: Consent or Declination. Defendant Urban Alchemy shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 12/29/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2021)
December 22, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City and County of San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 1/28/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Responses due by 1/5/2022. Replies due by 1/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rosenblit, Renee) (Filed on 12/22/2021)
December 16, 2021 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Shawn Strickland.. (Wagda, Donald) (Filed on 12/16/2021)
December 16, 2021 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by City and County of San Francisco.. (Rosenblit, Renee) (Filed on 12/16/2021)
December 16, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City and County of San Francisco re #1 Notice of Removal, (Rosenblit, Renee) (Filed on 12/16/2021)
December 7, 2021 Filing 6 STIPULATION filed by City and County of San Francisco. (Rosenblit, Renee) (Filed on 12/7/2021)
November 17, 2021 Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 34611157094. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2021)
November 15, 2021 Filing 4 STIPULATION filed by City and County of San Francisco. (Rosenblit, Renee) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
November 12, 2021 Filing 3 STIPULATION filed by City and County of San Francisco. (Rosenblit, Renee) (Filed on 11/12/2021)
November 9, 2021 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/23/2021. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2021)
November 9, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-21-595323. (). Filed byCity and County of San Francisco. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rosenblit, Renee) (Filed on 11/9/2021)
November 9, 2021 #Electronic filing error. Filing fee not paid. Please pay the filing fee through Pay.gov by clicking on Civil > Other Documents > New Case Filing Fee in CM/ECF. [err701] Re:[ 1] Notice of Removal, filed by City and County of San Francisco (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strickland v. Urban Alchemy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Strickland
Represented By: Donald Cloyce Wagda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Urban Alchemy
Represented By: Shane K. Anderies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City and County of San Francisco
Represented By: Renee E. Rosenblit
Represented By: David Sen-Fu Chiu
Represented By: Meredith Blagden Osborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?