Arroyo, Jr. v. Peninsula Lube, Inc.
Plaintiff: Rafael Arroyo, Jr.
Defendant: Peninsula Lube, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv08779
Filed: November 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward M Chen
Referring Judge: Donna M Ryu
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2021 Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. Peninsula Lube, Inc. served on 12/10/2021, answer due 12/31/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 12/28/2021) Modified on 12/28/2021 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
December 16, 2021 Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by Peninsula Lube, Inc. (Morin, Richard) (Filed on 12/16/2021)
December 16, 2021 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byPeninsula Lube, Inc.. (Morin, Richard) (Filed on 12/16/2021)
December 16, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J. Morin (Morin, Richard) (Filed on 12/16/2021)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/17/2022 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/10/2022. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/24/2021. (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2021)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 11/172021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2021)
November 16, 2021 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2021)
November 15, 2021 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Rafael Arroyo, Jr... (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
November 15, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Peninsula Lube, Inc. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
November 15, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaina Duggal (Duggal, Aaina) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
November 15, 2021 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
November 12, 2021 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/26/2021. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2021)
November 12, 2021 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 11/12/2021)
November 12, 2021 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Rafael Arroyo, Jr. re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 11/12/2021)
November 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-16619054.). Filed byRafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 11/12/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arroyo, Jr. v. Peninsula Lube, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rafael Arroyo, Jr.
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Aaina Duggal
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Prathima Reddy Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peninsula Lube, Inc.
Represented By: Richard J. Morin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?