Thornton v. FCA US LLC
| Patrick Thornton |
| FCA US LLC and Does 1 to 10 |
| 3:2021cv08807 |
| November 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Maxine M Chesney |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
REPLY (re #16 MOTION to Remand ) filed byPatrick Thornton. (Lopez, Julian) (Filed on 1/3/2022)
|
|
Filing 19
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #16 MOTION to Remand ) filed byFCA US LLC. (Skanes, Mark) (Filed on 12/27/2021)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF DOCUMENTS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 20, 2021. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2021)
|
|
Filing 17
CLERK'S NOTICE CONVERTING JANUARY 28, 2022 AT 9:00 AM MOTION HEARING TO A ZOOM WEBINAR. As to #16 MOTION to Remand .Motion Hearing set for 1/28/2022 at 09:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand. uscourts.gov/mmc General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Motion Hearing set for 1/28/2022 at 09:00 AM in S an Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.),(tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2021)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION to Remand filed by Patrick Thornton. Motion Hearing set for 1/28/2022 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Responses due by 12/27/2021. Replies due by 1/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities)(Lopez, Julian) (Filed on 12/13/2021)
|
|
Filing 15
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/18/2022 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/11/2022.. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/13/2021. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2021)
|
|
Filing 14
Case reassigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Judge Richard Seeborg no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2021)
|
|
Filing 13
RELATED CASE ORDER. Thornton v FCA US LLC, C 21-cv-04090 MMC, is related to Thornton v FCA US LLC, C 21-cv-08807 RS. The Clerk of Court is ordered to reassign the later-filed action to the undersigned. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 8, 2021. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2021)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER for related case determination (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2021)
|
|
Filing 11
CLERK'S NOTICE NOTICE RE REASSIGNED CASE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/17/2022 10:00 AM before Judge Richard Seeborg upon reassignment. Case Management Statement due by 2/10/2022. All parties shall appear by videoconference using log-in instructions the Court will provide in advance. For a copy of Judge Seeborg's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2021)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 12/02/2021. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2021)
|
|
Filing 9
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2021)
|
|
Filing 8
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Patrick Thornton. (Lopez, Julian) (Filed on 11/29/2021) Modified on 11/30/2021 (kmg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by FCA US LLC.. (Skanes, Mark) (Filed on 11/29/2021)
|
|
Filing 6
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/8/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/15/2022 02:00 PM in McKinleyville, To Be Determined. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2021)
|
|
Filing 5
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/29/2021. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
|
|
Answer to Removed Complaint (See Doc No. #1 -10) by FCA US LLC. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2021)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by FCA US LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Notice of Appearance, #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, (Skanes, Mark) (Filed on 11/12/2021) Modified on 11/15/2021 (kmg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 3
Certificate of Interested Entities by FCA US LLC identifying Corporate Parent FCA North America Holdings LLC, Corporate Parent Stellantis N.V. (formerly known as Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V.), Other Affiliate FCA Holdco B.V. for FCA US LLC. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Notice of Appearance ( Skanes, Mark) (Filed on 11/12/2021) Modified on 11/15/2021 (kmg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Mark W. Skanes (Skanes, Mark) (Filed on 11/12/2021)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lake County Superior Court. Their case number is CV421759. (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACANDC-16622040). Filed by FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Skanes, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Civil Cover Sheet) (Skanes, Mark) (Filed on 11/12/2021) Modified on 11/17/2021 (gba, COURT STAFF).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
