Bush v. Sonoma West Holdings Inc et al
| William David Bush |
| Sonoma West Holdings Inc and Michael Babbini |
| 3:2021cv08853 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by William David Bush. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2021)
|
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/18/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/25/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE and ORDER - Standing Order. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by William David Bush. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Michael Babbini, Sonoma West Holdings Inc. Filed byWilliam David Bush. Consent/Declination due by 11/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2021)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
