Elmore v. Coherent, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Richard Dale Elmore, Jr.
Defendant: Coherent, Inc. and L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Case Number: 3:2021cv08862
Filed: November 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Referring Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2022 #Electronic filing error. REMINDER TO COUNSEL: Incorrect Event Used. The correct event Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement. In the future, th e correct event is found under Civil Events >Other Filings> Notices. [err101] Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #24 Statement filed by L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2022)
January 7, 2022 Filing 24 Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons by L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Sachs, Michael) (Filed on 1/7/2022) Modified on 1/10/2022 (bns, COURT STAFF).
January 7, 2022 Filing 23 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Coherent, Inc. (Wohl, Jeffrey) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
January 7, 2022 Filing 22 ***DISREGARD, REFILED AT DOCKET NO. #23 *** Statement Corporate Disclosure Statement by Coherent, Inc.. (Wohl, Jeffrey) (Filed on 1/7/2022) Modified on 1/10/2022 (bns, COURT STAFF).
January 7, 2022 Filing 21 Certificate of Interested Entities by Coherent, Inc. (Wohl, Jeffrey) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
January 7, 2022 Filing 20 Defendant Coherent, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint for Benefits Under ERISA Section 502(A)(1)(B); Breach of Fiduciary Duty Pursuant to ERISA Section 502(A)(3) byCoherent, Inc.. (Wohl, Jeffrey) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
January 7, 2022 Filing 19 Statement Corporate Disclosure Statement by L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Sachs, Michael) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
January 7, 2022 Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint byL3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Sachs, Michael) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
January 7, 2022 #Electronic filing error. Incorrect PDF attached. [err201] The correct event is Corporate Disclosure Statement. Correct event is found under Civil Events > Other Filings > N otices > Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures. Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #22 Statement filed by Coherent, Inc. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Order by Judge Vince Chhabria granting #16 Motion for Pro Hac Vice -Wilhelm. (bxs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2021)
December 17, 2021 Filing 16 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice (Paul A. Wilhelm, Clark Hill PLC) ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16732206.) filed by L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State of MI Certificate of Good Standing)(Wilhelm, Paul) (Filed on 12/17/2021)
December 8, 2021 Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Richard Dale Elmore, Jr Proof of Service for Misc Court Documents to L3Harris (Aqui, Diane) (Filed on 12/8/2021)
December 8, 2021 Filing 14 JOINT STIPULATION filed by L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC and Richard Dale Elmore, Jr.. (Sachs, Michael) (Filed on 12/8/2021) Modified on 12/9/2021 (bns, COURT STAFF).
December 3, 2021 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Dale Elmore, Jr. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC served on 11/18/2021, answer due 12/9/2021. (Aqui, Diane) (Filed on 12/3/2021)
December 3, 2021 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Richard Dale Elmore, Jr for Misc Court Documents to Coherent Inc. (Aqui, Diane) (Filed on 12/3/2021)
December 3, 2021 Filing 11 Joint Stipulation To Extend Coherent's Deadline To Respond To Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Complaint, filed by Coherent, Inc. and Richard Dale Elmore Jr.. (Wohl, Jeffrey) (Filed on 12/3/2021) Modified on 12/6/2021 (bns, COURT STAFF).
December 1, 2021 Filing 10 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Case Management Statement due by 2/23/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/2/2022 at 01:00 PM by Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/vc Court Appearances: b> Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at vccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than Thursday, February 24th, 2022, by no later than 10:00AM.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bxs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2021)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 12/01/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2021)
November 30, 2021 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2021)
November 30, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Richard Dale Elmore, Jr re #1 Complaint, to Coherent, Inc. (Aqui, Diane) (Filed on 11/30/2021)
November 30, 2021 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Richard Dale Elmore, Jr.. (Aqui, Diane) (Filed on 11/30/2021)
November 17, 2021 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/10/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/17/2022 01:30 PM. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2021)
November 17, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Coherent, Inc., L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2021)
November 16, 2021 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/30/2021. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2021)
November 16, 2021 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Aqui, Diane) (Filed on 11/16/2021)
November 16, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-16631491.). Filed byRichard Dale Elmore, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Aqui, Diane) (Filed on 11/16/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elmore v. Coherent, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Dale Elmore, Jr.
Represented By: Diane Aqui
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coherent, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Wohl
Represented By: Melissa Rake
Represented By: Stephen Henry Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Represented By: Paul Anthony Wilhelm
Represented By: Michael Benjamin Sachs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?