Dugar v. Pak "N" Save Store #3111
| Ernesto Dugar, III |
| Pak "N" Save Store #3111 |
| 3:2021cv08904 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SCREENING ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 1/11/2022. Amended complaint due by 2/17/2022. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Mailed to Plaintiff via USPS on 1/11/2022.
|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by December 20, 2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. No Service/Under 1915 Review. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/10/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/17/2022 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ernesto Dugar, III. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pak "N" Save Store #3111. No process, In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Ernesto Dugar, III. Consent/Declination due by 12/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dugar v. Pak "N" Save Store #3111 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ernesto Dugar, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pak "N" Save Store #3111 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
