The County of Roosevelt v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
| The County of Roosevelt |
| McKinsey & Company Inc. |
| 3:2021cv09484 |
| December 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of New Mexico; Case Number 1:21-cv-01114. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-17) by JPML (certified copy) transferring this matter to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1407; assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer (MDL 2996). (bl) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 21-2996: New Mexico, 1:21cv01114, The County of Roosevelt v. McKinsey & Company, Inc., Opened in California Northern District as 21-9484 CRB pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order CTO 17 cc: JPMDL (lsk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2021) |
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. The Court finds good cause to delay entry of a scheduling order and Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's complaint shall be tolled pending resolution of Defendant's motion to stay. (rps)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by McKinsey & Company, Inc. (Montano, Larry) |
| Filing 3 Opposed MOTION to Stay Defendant's Motion for a Stay of Proceedings Pending Transfer for Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1407 and for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by McKinsey & Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Montano, Larry) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by McKinsey & Company, Inc. from Ninth Judicial District Court, case number D-911-CV-2021-00138. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by McKinsey & Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Montano, Larry) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7996348 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by McKinsey & Company, Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Montano, Larry) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (dr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The County of Roosevelt v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The County of Roosevelt | |
| Represented By: | Carlos E Sedillo |
| Represented By: | Joshua K Conaway |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: McKinsey & Company Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Larry J Montano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
