Saxton et al v. County of Sonoma et al
Plaintiff: Michelle Saxton, Clark James, Estate of Amber Marcotte, Estate of Michael Marcotte and James Clark
Defendant: County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, Sonoma County Sheriff's Department, Sonoma County Sheriff Mark Essick and DOES 1-50
Case Number: 3:2021cv09499
Filed: December 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Referring Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Order by Judge Susan Illston granting #15 Motion for Pro Hac Vice of Chloe F. Rosenberg.(ec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2022)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16842563.) filed by James Clark, Estate of Amber Marcotte, Estate of Michael Marcotte, Michelle Saxton. (Rosenberg, Chloe) (Filed on 1/26/2022)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, Sonoma County Sheriff Mark Essick, Sonoma County Sheriff's Department. Motion Hearing set for 3/4/2022 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 01, 17th Floor before Judge Susan Illston. Responses due by 2/9/2022. Replies due by 2/16/2022. (Bluestone, Marshall) (Filed on 1/19/2022)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE AND CLERK'S NOTICE ON REASSIGNMENT: Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/4/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/11/2022 at 02:30 PM - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/si Court Appeara nces: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at sicrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 3/2/22 at 2 pm Pacific.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Case Management Stat ement due by 3/4/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/11/2022 02:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (ec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2022)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Susan Illston for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 01/04/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2022)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2022)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, Sonoma County Sheriff Mark Essick, Sonoma County Sheriff's Department.. (Bluestone, Marshall) (Filed on 1/3/2022)
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by James Clark, Estate of Amber Marcotte, Estate of Michael Marcotte, Michelle Saxton. County of Sonoma served on 12/22/2021, answer due 1/12/2022 ; Sonoma County Board of Supervisors served on 12/22/2021, answer due 1/12/2022 ; Sonoma County Sheriff Mark Essick served on 12/22/2021, answer due 1/12/2022 ; Sonoma County Sheriff's Department served on 12/22/2021, answer due 1/12/2022. (Agre, Lyn) (Filed on 12/28/2021) Modified on 12/28/2021 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. The correct event is 'SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED' found under the Initial Pleadings and Service/Service of Process cate gory. [err101]Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #9 Certificate of Service, filed by Estate of Michael Marcotte, James Clark, Estate of Amber Marcotte, Michelle Saxton. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2021)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by James Clark, Estate of Amber Marcotte, Estate of Michael Marcotte, Michelle Saxton.. (Agre, Lyn) (Filed on 12/21/2021)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward E. Shapiro (Shapiro, Edward) (Filed on 12/10/2021)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, Sonoma County Sheriff Mark Essick, Sonoma County Sheriff's Department. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2021)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/3/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/10/2022 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2021)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/22/2021. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2021)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Agre, Lyn) (Filed on 12/8/2021)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Estate of Amber Marcotte, Estate of Michael Marcotte, Clark James, Michelle Saxton . (Agre, Lyn) (Filed on 12/8/2021)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, Sonoma County Sheriff Mark Essick, Sonoma County Sheriff's Department (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-16702064). Filed by Estate of Amber Marcotte, James Clark, Estate of Michael Marcotte, Michelle Saxton. (Agre, Lyn) (Filed on 12/8/2021) Modified on 12/9/2021 (slh, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saxton et al v. County of Sonoma et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Saxton
Represented By: Lyn R Agre
Represented By: Lyn R. Agre
Represented By: Chloe Freedman Rosenberg
Represented By: Edward E. Shapiro
Represented By: Elizabeth R. Grossman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clark James
Represented By: Lyn R Agre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Estate of Amber Marcotte
Represented By: Lyn R Agre
Represented By: Lyn R. Agre
Represented By: Chloe Freedman Rosenberg
Represented By: Edward E. Shapiro
Represented By: Elizabeth R. Grossman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Estate of Michael Marcotte
Represented By: Lyn R Agre
Represented By: Lyn R. Agre
Represented By: Chloe Freedman Rosenberg
Represented By: Edward E. Shapiro
Represented By: Elizabeth R. Grossman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Clark
Represented By: Elizabeth R. Grossman
Represented By: Lyn R. Agre
Represented By: Chloe Freedman Rosenberg
Represented By: Edward E. Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Sonoma
Represented By: Marshall E. Bluestone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sonoma County Board of Supervisors
Represented By: Marshall E. Bluestone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sonoma County Sheriff's Department
Represented By: Marshall E. Bluestone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sonoma County Sheriff Mark Essick
Represented By: Marshall E. Bluestone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?