Harris v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Jerome Harris
Defendant: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. and Vancouver Toyota
Case Number: 4:2021cv09570
Filed: December 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Referring Judge: Joseph C Spero
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Vancouver Toyota against Kevin Jerome Harris. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR DISMISSAL. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 01/13/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE.. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/12/2022. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:drive on 1/11/2022.
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Objections due January 26, 2022. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on January 12, 2022. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive on 1-11-2022. Modified on 1/12/2022 (klh, COURT STAFF).
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 1/18/2022. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive on 1/3/2022
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why complaint should not be dismissed. Response due January 10, 2022. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on December 13, 2021. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive on 12/14/2021. Modified on 12/14/2021 (klh, COURT STAFF).
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/4/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/11/2022 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kevin Jerome Harris. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2021)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (no process) against Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Vancouver Toyota, (Filing Fee: ifpp entered 12/10/2021). Filed byKevin Jerome Harris. Consent/Declination due by 12/27/2021. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet) (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Jerome Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vancouver Toyota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?