Jimenez-Hernandez et al v. Mayorkas
| Juan Manuel Jimenez-Hernandez and Loreyda Meza-Fuentes |
| Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 3:2021cv09582 |
| December 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting #11 Stipulation to Extend Stay. Status Report due by 7/1/2022. (sklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2022)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS filed by Alejandro Mayorkas, Juan Manuel Jimenez-Hernandez and Loreyda Meza-Fuentes. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 1/11/2022) Modified on 1/12/2022 (bns, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Alejandro Mayorkas.. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 1/11/2022) |
| Filing 9 ***DISREGARD, DOCUMENT FILED IN WRONG CASE.*** CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Juan Manuel Jimenez-Hernandez, Loreyda Meza-Fuentes (IMMIGRATION MANDAMUS PROCEDURAL ORDER; STANDING ORDERS FOR ALL JUDGES OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA; STANDING ORDERS FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE BEELER (GENERAL, COURT CALL, EXHIBIT TAG),; CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION) (Crabtree, Kevin) (Filed on 12/22/2021) Modified on 12/23/2021 (bns, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juan Manuel Jimenez-Hernandez, Loreyda Meza-Fuentes. All Defendants. (Crabtree, Kevin) (Filed on 12/22/2021) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Juan Manuel Jimenez-Hernandez, Loreyda Meza-Fuentes (IMMIGRATION MANDAMUS PROCEDURAL ORDER; STANDING ORDERS FOR ALL JUDGES OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA; STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE SALLIE KIM; CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION) (Crabtree, Kevin) (Filed on 12/22/2021) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Juan Manuel Jimenez-Hernandez, Loreyda Meza-Fuentes.. (Crabtree, Kevin) (Filed on 12/20/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2021) |
| Filing 4 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2021) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/27/2021. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Crabtree, Kevin) (Filed on 12/10/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus and under Administrative Procedure Act against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-16710440.). Filed byJuan Manuel Jimenez-Hernandez, Loreyda Meza-Fuentes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Crabtree, Kevin) (Filed on 12/10/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
