Doe v. Regents of the University of California
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Regents of the University of California
Case Number: 3:2021cv09605
Filed: December 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael D. Bruno (Bruno, Michael) (Filed on 2/9/2022)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING TIME: The court has a trial and so needs to conduct its 9:30 a.m. calendar at 4:00 p.m. Motion Hearing #8 MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant The Regents of the University of California's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f)]; Memorandum of Points and Authorities) set for 2/17/2022 at 4:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2022)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPLY (re #8 MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant The Regents of the University of California's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f)]; Memorandum of Points and Authorities) ) (Defendant The Regents of the University of California's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss [Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6)], or In The Alternative, Motion to Strike [Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f)]) filed byRegents of the University of California. (Wintterle, Rachel) (Filed on 1/28/2022)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #8 MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant The Regents of the University of California's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f)]; Memorandum of Points and Authorities) ) filed byJohn Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Patten, Dow) (Filed on 1/21/2022)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by John Doe.. (Patten, Dow) (Filed on 1/18/2022)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Regents of the University of California.. (Wintterle, Rachel) (Filed on 1/18/2022)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 1/21/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2022)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 1/14/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Motion Hearing #8 MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant The Regents of the University of California's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f)]; Memorandum of Points and Authorities) set for 2/17/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons grante d access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant The Regents of the University of California's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f)]; Memorandum of Points and Authorities) filed by Regents of the University of California. Motion Hearing set for 2/17/2022 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 1/21/2022. Replies due by 1/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order ([Proposed] Order re Defendant The Regents of the University of California's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss, or In the Alternative Motion to Strike))(Wintterle, Rachel) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 1/18/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2022)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Doe. Regents of the University of California served on 12/17/2021, answer due 1/7/2022. (Patten, Dow) (Filed on 12/21/2021)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/10/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/17/2022 11:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2021)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Regents of the University of California. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2021)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/27/2021. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2021)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Patten, Dow) (Filed on 12/13/2021)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Regents of the University of California ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-16712982.). Filed byJohn Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Patten, Dow) (Filed on 12/13/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Regents of the University of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe
Represented By: Dow Wakefield Patten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Regents of the University of California
Represented By: Michael D. Bruno
Represented By: Rachel Wintterle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?