The County of Mora County v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
| The County of Mora County |
| McKinsey & Company Inc. |
| 3:2021cv09637 |
| December 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Case transferred in from District of New Mexico; Case Number 1:21-cv-01112. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: re MDL 2296: New Mexico, 1:21cv01112, The County of Mora County v. McKinsey & Company, Inc., Opened in California Northern District as 21-9637 CRB pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order CTO 17 cc: JPMDL (lsk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2021) |
| Filing 8 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-17) by JPML (certified copy) transferring this matter to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1407; assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer (MDL 2996). (bl) |
| Filing 7 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge Judith C. Herrera as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. The Court finds good cause to delay entry of a scheduling order and Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's complaint shall be tolled pending resolution of Defendant's motion to stay. (rps)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 10 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (kfo)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by McKinsey & Company, Inc. (Montano, Larry) |
| Filing 3 Opposed MOTION to Stay Defendant's Motion for a Stay of Proceedings Pending Transfer for Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1407 and for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by McKinsey & Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Montano, Larry) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by McKinsey & Company, Inc. from Fourth Judicial District Court, case number D-430-CV-2021-00034. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by McKinsey & Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Montano, Larry) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7996263 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by McKinsey & Company, Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Montano, Larry) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (dr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The County of Mora County v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The County of Mora County | |
| Represented By: | Carlos E Sedillo |
| Represented By: | Joshua K Conaway |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: McKinsey & Company Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Larry J Montano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
