Augusta, Georgia et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
| Augusta, Georgia and Laurens County, Georgia |
| McKinsey and Company, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv09830 |
| December 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Mark Philip Pifko (Pifko, Mark) (Filed on 1/6/2022) |
| Filing 11 Case transferred in from District of Georgia Southern; Case Number 1:21-cv-00173. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 21-md-2996 CRB: Southern Georgia, 1:21-cv-173 JRH BKE, Augusta, Georgia et al. v. McKinsey and Co., Opened in California Northern District as 21-cv-9830 VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 19 cc: JPMDL (lsk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2021) |
| Filing 10 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER CVTO-19 RE MDL NO. 2996. Signed by Clerk of the Panel on 12/20/2021. (pts) |
| Case transferred to District of Northern District of California. File Transferred Electronically. (pts) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting re #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Douglas Bryant Chaffin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/17/21. (loh)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (slt) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing by Augusta, Georgia, Laurens County, Georgia re #7 Notice (Other), #6 Notice of Filing to Satisfy Deficiency (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - List of Cases)(Chaffin, D.) |
| Filing 7 DEFICIENCY NOTICE re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. After two days a notice of noncompliance will be submitted to a judicial officer. (slt) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing by Augusta, Georgia, Laurens County, Georgia re #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number AGASDC-3248303, Fee Amount $200, Signature by Petitioner (Chaffin, D.) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number AGASDC-3248303, Fee Amount $200, by Augusta, Georgia, Laurens County, Georgia. Responses due by 12/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, Southern District of Mississippi, #2 Incorrect format PDF)(Chaffin, D.) Counsel's signature is filed at Notice #6 . |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance with deficiency notice due by 12/20/2021. (slt) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re: #3 Notice of Filing Deficiency. The Court Orders Plaintiff's counsel to make arrangements for admission to the Court within seven days of the date of this Order. The Court Directs the Clerk to serve this Order electronically on each attorney with an email address listed at the end of the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/9/2021. (csr)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 12/16/2021 re: #4 Order. (csr) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. After 14 days a notice of noncompliance will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. Set Deadline: Compliance due by 12/7/2021. (ca) |
|
Filing 2
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/23/2021. (ca)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against McKinsey and Company, Inc., filed by Augusta, Georgia, Laurens County, Georgia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ca) |
| Filing fee: $402, receipt number AGASDC-3232832. (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
