Hale v. Brinker International, Inc. et al
Amanda Hale |
Brinker International, Inc., Brinker International Payroll Company, L.P. and Brinker Restaurant Corporation |
3:2021cv09978 |
December 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Brinker International Payroll Company, L.P., Brinker International, Inc., Brinker Restaurant Corporation (Garcia, Marina) (Filed on 1/7/2022) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Brinker International Payroll Company, L.P., Brinker International, Inc., Brinker Restaurant Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Brinker International, Inc. for Brinker International Payroll Company, L.P., Brinker International, Inc., Brinker Restaurant Corporation. (Garcia, Marina) (Filed on 1/7/2022) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 3/16/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/23/2022 01:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2021) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Vince Chhabria. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2021) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1332(d), and 1441(b) from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is 21CV002855. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-16749709). Filed byBrinker Restaurant Corporation, Brinker International Payroll Company, L.P., Brinker International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Marina I. Garcia in support of Defendants' Notice of Removal of Action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, #2 Declaration of Carol Cox in support of Defendants' Notice of Removal of Action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, #3 Declaration of Daniel Fuller in support of Defendants' Notice of Removal of Action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reese, Kevin) (Filed on 12/23/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.