In the Matter of Leroy Bishop Austin - SBN #175497
Leroy Bishop Austin |
3:2021mc80201 |
August 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
James Donato |
Other Statutory Actions |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by certified mail re #1 Order to Show Cause. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2021) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #1 Order to Show Cause (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
Filing 1 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re Suspension from Membership in Good Standing of the Bar of the Court. Show Cause Response due by 9/30/2021. Signed by Judge James Donato on 08/20/2021. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: In the Matter of Leroy Bishop Austin - SBN #175497 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Leroy Bishop Austin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.