In Re: Subpoena to Pacific Agri-Products, Inc.
In Re: Subpoena to Pacific Agri-Products, Inc. and Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs |
Pacific Agri-Products, Inc. |
3:2021mc80241 |
October 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Donna M Ryu |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER re: #10 Notice filed by Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs. In light of Plaintiffs' withdrawal of the joint discovery letter #9 and the underlying action's consolidation into an MDL before the District of Minnesota, the joint discovery letter #9 is denied as moot. The clerk is ordered to close this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 11/19/2021. ***Civil Case Terminated. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2021) |
Filing 10 Notice of Withdrawal of CIIPPs' Motion to Compel and Joint Discovery Letter re #1 Motion to Compel (Miscellaneous Case Opening), #9 Letter by Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs. (McFarland, Ian) (Filed on 11/18/2021) Modified on 11/18/2021 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 9 Joint Letter re Pac-Agri MTC by Pacific Agri-Products, Inc., Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs. (Sawyer, Adrian) (Filed on 11/12/2021) Modified on 11/15/2021 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #5 Ian F. McFarland's Motion for admission Pro Hac Vice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2021) |
Filing 7 ORDER of 10/22/2021 by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying #1 motion to compel without prejudice and terminating #6 stipulated request for order changing time. The parties shall file a joint discovery letter per this order by 11/12/2021. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2021) |
Filing 6 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR BRIEFING (L.R. 6-2) AND SETTING HEARING DATE ON COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA; re #1 Motion to Compel filed by Pacific Agri-Products, Inc., Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sawyer, Adrian) (Filed on 10/21/2021) Modified on 10/22/2021 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 5 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16517727.) filed by Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs. (McFarland, Ian) (Filed on 10/20/2021) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by In Re: Subpoena to Pacific Agri-Products, Inc. re #1 Motion to Compel (Miscellaneous Case Opening), #2 Declaration in Support, (Tostrud, Jon) (Filed on 10/14/2021) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2021) |
Filing 2 Declaration of Ian F. McFarland in Support of #1 Motion to Compel (Miscellaneous Case Opening), filed byIn Re: Subpoena to Pacific Agri-Products, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Tostrud, Jon) (Filed on 10/13/2021) |
Filing 1 MOTION TO COMPEL Compliance with Subpoena against Pacific Agri-Products, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 49, receipt number 0971-16492437.). Filed by In Re: Subpoena to Pacific Agri-Products, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tostrud, Jon) (Filed on 10/13/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.