Instagram, LLC et al v. Instasize, Inc.
Plaintiff: Instagram, LLC and Kevin Systrom
Defendant: Instasize, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021mc80298
Filed: December 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Alex G Tse
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Order by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse granting in part #1 Motion to Quash and denying #8 Motion to Strike. (agtlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2022)
January 26, 2022 Filing 13 CLERKS NOTICE RESCHEDULING MOTION HEARING: The hearing on the motion to strike #8 is rescheduled to 2/25/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/agt General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedin gs held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2022)
January 25, 2022 Filing 12 REPLY (re #8 MOTION to Strike #7 Brief Section II.B.2. of Reply ) filed byInstasize, Inc.. (Miller, Ryan) (Filed on 1/25/2022)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice signed by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse: granting #10 Application. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2022)
January 19, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16817873.) filed by Instasize, Inc.. (Berkley, Brian) (Filed on 1/19/2022)
January 18, 2022 Filing 9 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #8 MOTION to Strike #7 Brief Section II.B.2. of Reply ) filed byKevin Systrom. (Cincone, Gia) (Filed on 1/18/2022)
January 10, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to Strike #7 Brief Section II.B.2. of Reply filed by Instasize, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 2/18/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Responses due by 1/24/2022. Replies due by 1/31/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Proposed Sur-Reply, #2 Exhibit A to Proposed Sur-Reply, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Miller, Ryan) (Filed on 1/10/2022)
January 3, 2022 Filing 7 Brief re #1 Motion to Quash Subpoena,, Reply Brief in Support filed byKevin Systrom. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Gia Cincone, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Cincone, Gia) (Filed on 1/3/2022)
December 31, 2021 Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Instasize, Inc. (Miller, Ryan) (Filed on 12/31/2021)
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice signed by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse: granting #4 Application. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2021)
December 27, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Ryan North Miller ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16753705.) filed by Instasize, Inc.. (Miller, Ryan) (Filed on 12/27/2021)
December 27, 2021 Filing 3 Response re #1 Motion to Quash Subpoena,, byInstasize, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Ryan Miller, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Praetzellis, Jack) (Filed on 12/27/2021)
December 20, 2021 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2021)
December 10, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA against Kevin Systrom ( Filing fee $ 49, receipt number ACANDC-16711078.). Filed by Kevin Systrom. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Gia Cincone, #2 Exhibit A to Cincone, #3 Exhibit B to Cincone, #4 Exhibit C to Cincone, #5 Exhibit D to Cincone, #6 Exhibit E to Cincone, #7 Exhibit F to Cincone, #8 Exhibit G to Cincone, #9 Exhibit H to Cincone, #10 Exhibit I to Cincone, #11 Exhibit J to Cincone, #12 Exhibit K to Cincone, #13 Declaration of Karina Newton, #14 Exhibit A to Newton, #15 Exhibit B to Newton, #16 Exhibit C to Newton, #17 Exhibit D to Newton, #18 Proposed Order)(Cincone, Gia) (Filed on 12/10/2021) Modified on 2/1/2022 (agtlc1, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Instagram, LLC et al v. Instasize, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Instagram, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Systrom
Represented By: Gia L. Cincone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Instasize, Inc.
Represented By: Ryan North Miller
Represented By: Brian A. Berkley, I
Represented By: Jack Conrad-Charles Praetzellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?