METAL ONE AMERICA, INC. v. KURT ORBAN PARTNERS, LLC et al
| METAL ONE AMERICA, INC. |
| KURT ORBAN PARTNERS, LLC, Kurt Matt Orban and John Foster |
| 3:2021mc80300 |
| December 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 27 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF ERRATA in Plaintiff's Application for Debtor Examination of Defendant Kurt Matt Orban by METAL ONE AMERICA, INC. (Pollak, Robert) (Filed on 1/12/2022) Modified on 1/13/2022 (msr, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF ERRATA in Plaintiff's Application for Debtor Examination of Defendant Kurt Orban Partners, LLC by Serving Its Manager - Kurt Matt Orban by METAL ONE AMERICA, INC. (Pollak, Robert) (Filed on 1/12/2022) Modified on 1/13/2022 (msr, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 10
ORDER (AS MODIFIED) by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #6 Motion for Judgment Debtor Exam. Judgment Debtor Exam of Kurt Matt Orban set for 3/2/2022 09:00 AM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. Parties can find the static Zoom link to Judge Ryu's virtual Zoom courtroom at: https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/ryu-donna-m-dmr/. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2021)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER (AS MODIFIED) by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #3 Motion for Judgment Debtor Exam. Judgment Debtor Exam of Kurt Orban Partners, LLC set for 3/2/2022 09:00 AM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. Parties can find the static Zoom link to Judge Ryu's virtual Zoom courtroom at: https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/ryu-donna-m-dmr/. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2021)
|
| Filing 8 Proposed Order re #7 Declaration in Support, #6 MOTION for Judgment Debtor Exam of KURT MATT ORBAN by METAL ONE AMERICA, INC.. (Pollak, Robert) (Filed on 12/28/2021) |
| Filing 7 Declaration of ROBERT L. POLLAK in Support of #6 MOTION for Judgment Debtor Exam of KURT MATT ORBAN filed byMETAL ONE AMERICA, INC.. (Related document(s) #6 ) (Pollak, Robert) (Filed on 12/28/2021) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Judgment Debtor Exam of KURT MATT ORBAN filed by METAL ONE AMERICA, INC.. Motion Hearing set for 3/2/2022 09:30 AM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Responses due by 1/11/2022. Replies due by 1/18/2022. (Pollak, Robert) (Filed on 12/28/2021) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Order re #3 MOTION for Judgment Debtor Exam of KURT ORBAN PARTNERS, LLC, #4 Declaration in Support of Robert L. Pollak by METAL ONE AMERICA, INC.. (Pollak, Robert) (Filed on 12/28/2021) |
| Filing 4 Declaration of ROBERT L. POLLAK in Support of #3 MOTION for Judgment Debtor Exam of KURT ORBAN PARTNERS, LLC filed byMETAL ONE AMERICA, INC.. (Related document(s) #3 ) (Pollak, Robert) (Filed on 12/28/2021) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Judgment Debtor Exam of KURT ORBAN PARTNERS, LLC filed by METAL ONE AMERICA, INC.. Motion Hearing set for 3/2/2022 09:30 AM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Responses due by 1/11/2022. Replies due by 1/18/2022. (Pollak, Robert) (Filed on 12/28/2021) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2021) |
| Filing 1 REGISTRATION OF JUDGMENT against All Defendants, (Filing Fee: $49.00, receipt number ACANDC-16717667). Filed by METAL ONE AMERICA, INC.. (Pollak, Robert) (Filed on 12/14/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
