Austin v. One Legal LLC
George Jarvis Austin |
One Legal LLC |
3:2022cv00360 |
January 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Laurel Beeler |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler for all further proceedings. Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 05/03/2022. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 22 CLERK'S NOTICE: The court construes the latest filing at ECF 20 as a request to extend the time to file an amended IFP application or pay the filing fee to 6/30/2022. The court grants that extension to 6/30/2022. No further extensions will be granted. The court withdraws the report and recommendation at ECF No. 19. The case will remain assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 21 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 05/03/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 20 OBJECTION to #19 Report and Recommendations & Inquiry regarding Time-frame byGeorge Jarvis Austin. (Austin, George) (Filed on 5/2/2022) |
Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Objections due by 5/16/2022. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 05/02/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 4/21/2022 is reset to 6/30/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 6/23/2022. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.go v/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 17 Request for Judicial Notice for a Northern District e-filing Guide or Manual to proactively avoid filing issues (as Plaintiff has not identified one for this District; whereas other District's and Circuit's are not necessarily directly transferable, or applicable) filed byGeorge Jarvis Austin. (Austin, George) (Filed on 3/25/2022) |
Filing 16 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/21/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings hel d by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1 6/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 15 Order terminating motions based on the Clerk's Notice at ECF No. 13. (Entered by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler.) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 14 Proposed Findings of Fact by George Jarvis Austin Basic Communication with Edee during early training to understand, and master their system: However as soon as breaches in their contract, evidencing inferior treatment (based on the OneLegal defined contract expectation, and terms) occurred, and Plaintiff notified Edee, TJ, and Cesar of the breaches (including non-timely pay), and eventually intentional discrimination, all went silent (and provided no correction to their conduct).. (Austin, George) (Filed on 2/18/2022) |
Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE: The plaintiff filed three docket entries that, in sum, ask for more time (until April 21, 2022) to address the procedural issues in his case, including filing an application to proceed in forma pauperis (or paying the filing fee) and determining whether to consent to magistrate jurisdiction. The court grants the request and extends the time to address these issues until April 21, 2022. At that point, if the plaintiff has not addressed them, the court will reassign the case with a recommendation to dismiss it without prejudice. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 12 Proposed Findings of Fact by George Jarvis Austin part of Initial Conversations Explaining Contract (from One Legal's Side) including Training Period (a bit under 3 months), order expectation (1st week, and long-term), and payment time-frame, and details all of which were breached by OneLegal along with Intentional Discrimination to deprive Plaintiff under 42 U.S.C. section 1981. (Austin, George) (Filed on 2/17/2022) |
Filing 11 First MOTION to Amend/Correct #9 Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination, Additional Time, or Leave to File, due to short-term time and resource constraints, First MOTION for Leave to File filed by George Jarvis Austin. Motion Hearing set for 4/21/2022 09:30 AM in Do Not Use To Be Determined before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 3/3/2022. Replies due by 3/10/2022. (Austin, George) (Filed on 2/17/2022) |
Filing 10 First MOTION to Amend/Correct #8 Response ( Non Motion ), #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, moves for additional time, or alternatively leave to pay (or file), First MOTION for Leave to File filed by George Jarvis Austin. Motion Hearing set for 4/14/2022 09:30 AM in Do Not Use To Be Determined before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 3/3/2022. Replies due by 3/10/2022. (Austin, George) (Filed on 2/17/2022) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 2/28/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE re #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by George Jarvis Austin. (Austin, George) (Filed on 2/1/2022) |
Filing 7 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by George Jarvis Austin. (Austin, George) (Filed on 1/21/2022) |
Filing 5 Letter from Plaintiff, George Jarvis Austin, noticing Defendant of non-enforce-ability of jury trial waivers in California per CA policy, and precedent by George Jarvis Austin. (Austin, George) (Filed on 1/21/2022) |
Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER: The attached notice and order notifies the plaintiff of resources available, attaches the district's handbook for litigants who do not have a lawyer, includes a flyer for contacting the court's help desk and instructs the plaintiff about serving the defendants. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 01/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Self Help Flyer, #2 Pro Se Handbook)(ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4 /14/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/21/2022 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by George Jarvis Austin. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (no process) against One Legal LLC, (Filing Fee: ifpp entered 1/19/2022). Filed by George Jarvis Austin. Consent/Declination due by 2/1/2022. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet, #(2) Envelope) (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Austin v. One Legal LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: George Jarvis Austin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: One Legal LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.