Bey v. Wells et al
Jamil Malik Bey and Marimar Cornejo |
Christina Wells and Mosser Companies Inc. |
3:2022cv00411 |
January 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Alex G Tse |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Requesting Service Address for Defendants. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 03/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. The Clerk will now reassign this case to a United States District Judge because one or more of the parties has requested reassignment to a United States District Judge or has not consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse: granting #2 Application. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 5 NOTICE Concerning Moot Points by Jamil Malik Bey, Marimar Cornejo. (Cornejo, Marimar) (Filed on 3/3/2022) Modified on 3/3/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jamil Malik Bey, Marimar Cornejo.. (Cornejo, Marimar) (Filed on 2/3/2022) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 4/15/202 2. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/22/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jamil Malik Bey. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2022) Modified on 1/24/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mosser Companies Inc., Christina Wells. Filed byJamil Malik Bey. Consent/Declination due by 2/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope)(cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.