Floyd v San Jose Police Department et al et al
Michael Devin Floyd |
San Jose Police Department, City Of San Jose, City of San Jose Office of the City Attorney, Joshua White, Dakota Peters, Eugene Ito, David Moreno and State of California |
3:2022cv00751 |
February 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Virginia K DeMarchi |
William H Orrick |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF SERVICE DOCUMENTS as to #17 Summons Issued by the U.S. Marshals Service. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2022) |
Filing 17 Summons Issued as to City Of San Jose, City of San Jose Office of the City Attorney, Eugene Ito, David Moreno, Dakota Peters, San Jose Police Department, State of California, Joshua White. (Attachments: #1 USM-285, #2 USM-285, #3 USM-285, #4 USM-285, #5 USM-285, #6 USM-285, #7 USM-285, #8 USM-285)(cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2022) |
Filing 16 ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/11/2022. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 15 First Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Michael Devin Floyd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Protective Order for the SealedDocumentA, #2 Unredacted Version of SealedDocumentA, #3 Exhibit Pitchess motion filed in defense of Plaintiff, #4 Proposed Order Proposed Protective Order, #5 Declaration Declaration of Support)(Floyd, Michael) (Filed on 3/10/2022) |
Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT According to Civil L.R. 79-5d, an Exhibit Filed Under Seal attachment must be provided against All Defendants. Filed byMichael Devin Floyd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Racial Injustice motion filed in defense of Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit Protective Order will be filed under seal)(Floyd, Michael) (Filed on 3/10/2022) |
Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT Forgot to attach exhibit (with jury demand) against All Defendants. Filed by Michael Devin Floyd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Motion filed in defense of the Plaintiff)(Floyd, Michael) (Filed on 3/9/2022) Modified on 3/10/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 12 ***DISREGARD, SEE DOCKET ENTRY #13 *** AMENDED COMPLAINT Made some adjustments I against All Defendants. Filed byMichael Devin Floyd. (Floyd, Michael) (Filed on 3/9/2022) Modified on 3/10/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 11 ***DISREGARD, SEE DOCKET ENTRY #13 *** AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filed byMichael Devin Floyd. (Floyd, Michael) (Filed on 3/9/2022) Modified on 3/10/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S #2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge William H. Orrick. Floyd must file the required Amended Complaint by April 29, 2022. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 9 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Floyd, Michael) (Filed on 2/27/2022) |
Filing 8 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 5/10/2022 02:00 PM via Videoconference. Case Management Statement due by 5/3/2022. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/22/2022. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 7 Case reassigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 2/22/2022 (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2022) |
Filing 6 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2022) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Michael Devin Floyd.. (Floyd, Michael) (Filed on 2/20/2022) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/3/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/10/2022 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor.. Signed by Judge DeMarchi on 2/4/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Michael Devin Floyd. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights against City Of San Jose, City of San Jose Office of the City Attorney, San Jose Police Department No process. IFP PENDING) Filed by Michael Devin Floyd. Consent/Declination due by 2/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.