Yang v. Bytedance Inc.
Stephen Yang |
Bytedance Inc. |
3:2022cv00807 |
February 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
James Donato |
Susan van Keulen |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/9/2022. (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2022) |
Filing 20 JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Vacating All Deadlines; Notice of Settlement by Bytedance Inc. (Mullins, Bradley) (Filed on 6/2/2022) Modified on 6/2/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 19 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 5/4/2022) |
Filing 18 ORDER. At the parties' joint request, Dkt. No. 16, defendant may respond to the complaint by June 3, 2022. The case management conference set for May 19, 2022, is continued to June 16, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint case management statement by June 9, 2022. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/3/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2022) |
Filing 17 ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2022) |
Filing 16 JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for Defendant Bytedance, Inc. to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint By an Additional 30 Days re #1 Complaint filed by Bytedance Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mullins, Bradley) (Filed on 4/26/2022) Modified on 4/28/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 15 JOINT STIPULATION Extending Time for Defendant Bytedance, Inc. to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by an Additional 30 Days re #1 Complaint filed by Bytedance Inc.. (Mullins, Bradley) (Filed on 3/29/2022) Modified on 3/30/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/19/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 5/12/2022.Signed by Judge James Donato on 2/25/2022. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2022) |
Filing 13 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 2/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2022) |
Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2022) |
Filing 11 ORDER re #8 Approving Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant Bytedance Inc. to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint. (svklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2022) |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Stephen Yang.. (Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 2/24/2022) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 3/9/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2022) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant Bytedance, Inc. to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by Bytedance Inc.. (Mullins, Bradley) (Filed on 2/23/2022) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stephen Yang. Bytedance Inc. served on 2/10/2022, answer due 3/3/2022. (Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 2/11/2022) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Bytedance Inc.. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2022) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/10/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/17/2022 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2022) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/22/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2022) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding a Copyrights (cc: form mailed to register). (Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 2/8/2022) Modified on 2/9/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 2/8/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT; Demand for Jury Trial against Bytedance Inc. (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number ACANDC-16882011.). Filed by Stephen Yang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photographs, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of the Photographs, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Sanders, Craig) (Filed on 2/8/2022) Modified on 2/9/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Yang v. Bytedance Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Stephen Yang | |
Represented By: | Craig B. Sanders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bytedance Inc. | |
Represented By: | Bradley J. Mullins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.