Doe 1 et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
Plaintiff: John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, john doe 5, John Doe 6, john doe 7, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, John Doe 10, John Doe 11 and John Doe 12
Defendant: Anthony N. Giarratano, National Collegiate Athletic Association, University of San Francisco, Nino Giarratano and Troy Nakamura
Case Number: 3:2022cv01559
Filed: March 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDERIn the attached order, the court dismisses the claims against the NCAA for lack of personal jurisdiction without prejudice to filing the case in the Southern District of Indiana, dismisses the claims of Does 4-12 because they are barred by the statute of limitations, denies the motion to dismiss the discrimination claims under Title IX and the California Education Code, grants the motion to dismiss the Title IX retaliation claim, grants the motion to dismiss the California Education Code 66281.5 claim, and denies the motion to dismiss the tort claims. The dismissal of all claims (except for lack of personal jurisdiction) is without prejudice to filing an amended complaint within twenty-eight days. Any amended complaint must have as an exhibit a blackline of the amended complaint against the operative complaint. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 1/4/2023)
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 87 STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d filed byJohn Doe 1, John Doe 10, John Doe 11, John Doe 12, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 6, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, john doe 5, john doe 7. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Snyder-Hill, Ohio State Univ. Order)(Related document(s) #79 ) (Fegan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 12/15/2022)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 86 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler: Motions Hearing held via Zoom on 12/8/2022. Matters are argued, submitted and taken under submission. Court to issue order. Total Time in Court: 1 hour, 9 minutes. Digital Recording Time: 11:49 - 12:58. Plaintiffs' Attorneys: Jonathan Selbin, Elizabeth A. Fegan, Michelle A. Lamy, and Nigar Shaikh. Defendants' Attorneys: Carolyn Luedtke, Hailyn Chen, Jonathan M Baum, Daniel A. Croley, and Scott Brian Rapkin. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 12/8/2022)
December 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 85 CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING TIME. Motions Hearing #64 MOTION to Dismiss , #65 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint, #67 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and #68 MOTION to Dismiss set for 12/8/2022 at 9:30 AM is reset to 11:00 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2022 )
November 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 84 REPLY (re #68 MOTION to Dismiss ) in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed byUniversity of San Francisco. (Baum, Jonathan) (Filed on 11/11/2022)
November 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 83 REPLY (re #65 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint ) (Request for Application of Incorporation by Reference Doctrine or Judicial Notice) filed byNational Collegiate Athletic Association. (Luedtke, Carolyn) (Filed on 11/11/2022)
November 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 82 REPLY (re #65 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint ) filed byNational Collegiate Athletic Association. (Attachments: #1 Luedtke Decl. in support, #2 Exhibit 1 to Luedtke Decl., #3 Exhibit 2 to Luedtke Decl., #4 Exhibit 3 to Luedtke Decl., #5 Exhibit 4 to Luedtke Decl., #6 Exhibit 5 to Luedtke Decl.)(Luedtke, Carolyn) (Filed on 11/11/2022)
November 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 81 REPLY (re #64 MOTION to Dismiss ) PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed byAnthony N. Giarratano. (Croley, Daniel) (Filed on 11/11/2022)
November 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 80 REPLY (re #67 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint ) filed byTroy Nakamura. (Rapkin, Scott) (Filed on 11/11/2022)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 79 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #64 MOTION to Dismiss , #68 MOTION to Dismiss , #65 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint, #67 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint ) filed byJohn Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, john doe 5, John Doe 6, john doe 7, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, John Doe 10, John Doe 11, John Doe 12. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan D. Selbin)(Fegan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 10/27/2022)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 78 RESPONSE re #66 Request for Judicial Notice, #69 Request for Judicial Notice, (Opposition) by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. (Fegan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 10/27/2022)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER re #76 Stipulation Regarding Plaintiffs' Page Limits for Omnibus Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/27/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2022)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 76 STIPULATION Regarding Plaintiffs' Page Limits for Omnibus Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss filed by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. (Ellenberger, Lynn) (Filed on 10/26/2022)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 75 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #70 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2022)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 74 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #73 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Ling S. Wang representing Plaintiffs. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2022)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17542966.) Filing fee previously paid on 09/16/2022 filed by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. (Wang, Ling) (Filed on 9/16/2022)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines as to #68 MOTION to Dismiss , #64 MOTION to Dismiss , #65 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint, #67 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. Responses due by 10/27/2022. Replies due by 11/11/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2022)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 72 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Motions Hearing #64 MOTION to Dismiss , #65 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint, #67 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, and #68 MOTION to Dismiss set for 12/8/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 10/27/2022. Replies due by 11/11/2022. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2022) Modified on 9/15/2022 (ejk, COURT STAFF).
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 71 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by University of San Francisco re #70 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (Baum, Jonathan) (Filed on 9/13/2022)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 70 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by University of San Francisco. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan Baum, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit 1 Unredacted, #4 Exhibit 2 Unredacted)(Baum, Jonathan) (Filed on 9/12/2022)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 69 Request for Judicial Notice re #68 MOTION to Dismiss filed byUniversity of San Francisco. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan Baum, #2 Exhibit 3, #3 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) #68 ) (Baum, Jonathan) (Filed on 9/12/2022)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MOTION to Dismiss filed by University of San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 12/8/2022 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 9/26/2022. Replies due by 10/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan Baum)(Baum, Jonathan) (Filed on 9/12/2022)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 67 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Troy Nakamura. Motion Hearing set for 12/8/2022 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 10/27/2022. Replies due by 11/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rapkin, Scott) (Filed on 9/12/2022)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 66 Request for Judicial Notice re #65 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint (Request for Application of the Incorporation by Reference Doctrine or Judicial Notice of Documents) filed byNational Collegiate Athletic Association. (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Order)(Related document(s) #65 ) (Luedtke, Carolyn) (Filed on 9/12/2022)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 65 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Class Action Complaint filed by National Collegiate Athletic Association. Motion Hearing set for 12/8/2022 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 10/27/2022. Replies due by 11/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Decl. of Kris Richardson in Support, #2 [Proposed] Order)(Luedtke, Carolyn) (Filed on 9/12/2022)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Anthony N. Giarratano. Motion Hearing set for 12/8/2022 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 10/27/2022. Replies due by 11/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Croley, Daniel) (Filed on 9/12/2022)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting Administrative Motion to Proceed Anonymously (ECF No. 53). (lblc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2022)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 62 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler: Case Management Conference held via Zoom on 8/25/2022. Matters are argued, submitted and taken under submission. Court to issue order. (Not Reported). Total Time in Court: 25 minutes. Plaintiffs' Attorneys: Jonathan Selbin, Elizabeth A. Fegan, Lynn Ellenberger, Michelle A. Lamy, and Nigar Shaikh. Defendants' Attorneys: Carolyn Luedtke, Jonathan M Baum, Scott Brian Rapkin, and Michael Steven Rapkin. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/25/2022)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 61 CLERKS NOTICE CORRECTING ZOOM WEBINAR: Further Case Management Conference set for 8/25/2022 at 2:30 PM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephon e or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2022)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 60 Order regarding #59 Motion to Strike #59 MOTION to Strike #58 Notice (Other) entered by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. The court orders the parties to confer today about an orderly process to address the motion to proceed as Doe plaintiffs, including a briefing schedule if the parties deem it appropriate. The submission must be joint and filed today, even if the parties disagree about the process. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Hearing Case Management Conference set for 8/25/2022 02:30 PM. After perusing the filings, and on further reflection, the court does not need further briefing but thinks a short hearing is appropriate and sets one for today at 2:30 p.m. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/agtGeneral Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 8/25/2022)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MOTION to Strike #58 Notice (Other) filed by University of San Francisco. Responses due by 9/7/2022. Replies due by 9/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Baum, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/24/2022)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 58 NOTICE by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 re #53 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Proceed Anonymously (Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/24/2022)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 57 Joinder DEFENDANT ANTHONY N. (AKA NINO) GIARRATANO'S WITHDRAWAL OF [53-2] STIPULATION FOR JOHN DOES 4-12 TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY AND JOINDER IN USF'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY by Anthony N. Giarratano. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Croley, Daniel) (Filed on 8/23/2022) Modified on 8/24/2022 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 56 NOTICE by Troy Nakamura Of Withdrawal of [53-2] Stipulation for John Does 4-12 to Proceed Anonymously and Joinder to #55 USF's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Scott Rapkin in Support of Notice of Withdrawal)(Rapkin, Scott) (Filed on 8/23/2022) Modified on 8/24/2022 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 55 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #53 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Proceed Anonymously ) filed byUniversity of San Francisco. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan M. Baum iso Opposition to Motion to Proceed Anonymously, #2 Proposed Order)(Baum, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/23/2022) Modified on 8/24/2022 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 54 Declaration of Jonathan D. Selbin in Support of #53 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Proceed Anonymously (Supplemental) filed byJohn Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. (Related document(s) #53 ) (Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/23/2022)
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Proceed Anonymously filed by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. Responses due by 8/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Stipulation re: Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Proceed Anonymously, #3 Declaration of Jonathan D. Selbin re: Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Proceed Anonymously)(Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/19/2022)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 52 NOTICE of Appearance by David Vincent Roth (Roth, David) (Filed on 8/9/2022)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 51 CLERKS NOTICE RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: The parties are hereby notified that the Initial Case Management Conference is rescheduled to 1/26/2023 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/agt General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated wit h this entry.) (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2022)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER granting Stipulation Regarding Defendants' Deadline to Respond to First Amended Class Action Complaint, Schedule for Briefing Motions to Dismiss, and Page Limits for NCAA's Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs' Opposition Brief signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. granting #49 Stipulation.The court grants the stipulation and the proposed schedule and page limits. If the responsive pleading is a motion to dismiss, it must reflect this approved schedule and set the matter for a motions hearing on the next available Thursday at 9:30 am at least two weeks after full briefing. The court does not set motions hearings and instead relies on the parties to calendar them, subject to the court's availability (always reflected on the external calendar). When setting the hearing, the parties can of course set it later than the customary two weeks if that makes sense. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2022)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 49 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT, SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, AND PAGE LIMITS FOR NCAA'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION BRIEF filed by National Collegiate Athletic Association. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Carolyn Luedtke In Support of Stipulation)(Luedtke, Carolyn) (Filed on 8/5/2022)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 48 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by University of San Francisco.. (Baum, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/5/2022)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 47 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Matthew Baum for Defendant University of San Francisco (Baum, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/5/2022)
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 46 Order denying #43 Administrative Motion entered by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler.Unless the parties agree to phase briefing, the court will not order it. The parties agree that extra pages beyond the standard twenty-five pages are in order. The court asks them to confer and agree to reasonable excess pages and to submit a joint stipulation (or at least, a joint statement that reflects their positions) within a week if possible.Another issue is non-appearing party University of San Francisco, which has until 8/15/2022 to appear and file its responsive pleading. The court reminds the parties that for dispositive motions, all parties -- even non-appearing parties -- must consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction before the court can decide the motion. The timing overall is fine: the court just flags the issue for administrative efficiency. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 45 Joinder re #43 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To Set Phased Briefing Schedule for Defendant NCAA's Rule 12 Motions by Anthony N. Giarratano. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Croley, Daniel) (Filed on 7/29/2022)
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 44 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #43 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To Set Phased Briefing Schedule for Defendant NCAA's Rule 12 Motions ) filed byJohn Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. (Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 7/28/2022)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order #Electronic filing error. Firm name has been added for attorney Michael Steven Rapkin. Address has been updated for attorneys Scott Brian Rapkin and Michael Steven Rapkin. Atto rneys are reminded to update the ECF account if there's any change of firm name or address. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #41 Notice of Appearance filed by Troy Nakamura, #39 Notice of Appearance filed by Troy Nakamura. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2022)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To Set Phased Briefing Schedule for Defendant NCAA's Rule 12 Motions filed by National Collegiate Athletic Association. Responses due by 7/29/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Carolyn H. Luedtke ISO Mtn for Administrative Relief, #2 Exhibit A to Luedtke Decl.: Email Correspondence Between Counsel for Plaintiffs & NCAA, #3 Proposed Order)(Luedtke, Carolyn) (Filed on 7/25/2022)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 42 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Troy Nakamura.. (Rapkin, Scott) (Filed on 7/25/2022)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 41 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Steven Rapkin (Rapkin, Michael) (Filed on 7/25/2022)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 40 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant Troy Nakamura shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/8/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2022)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Brian Rapkin (Rapkin, Scott) (Filed on 7/25/2022)
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Anthony N. Giarratano, Troy Nakamura, National Collegiate Athletic Association, University of San Francisco. Filed byJohn Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 1. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 7/15/2022)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Croley, Daniel) (Filed on 7/6/2022)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: In light of the fact that the defendants have not appeared, the court continues the CMC from 7/28/2022 to 9/29/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 9/22/2022. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/ 5/2022)
May 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 35 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Anthony N. Giarratano.. (Croley, Daniel) (Filed on 5/24/2022)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 34 STIPULATION Second Stipulation of Extension of Time for Nino Giarratano filed by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. (Ellenberger, Lynn) (Filed on 5/20/2022)
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 33 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant Anthony N. Giarratano shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/31/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2022)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 6/9/2022 is reset to 7/28/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 7/21/2022. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts. gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2022)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ANTHONY NINO GIARRATANO TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by Anthony N. Giarratano. (Croley, Daniel) (Filed on 5/9/2022)
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by National Collegiate Athletic Association.. (Luedtke, Carolyn) (Filed on 4/26/2022)
April 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon E. Martinez as Counsel for Defendant The National Collegiate Athletic Association (Martinez, Brandon) (Filed on 4/19/2022)
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STIPULATION Regarding Defendant The University of San Francisco's Deadline to Respond to Forthcoming First Amended Complaint filed by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. (Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 4/14/2022)
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant National Collegiate Athletic Association shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 4/27/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2022)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance by Hailyn Jennifer Chen as Counsel for Defendant the National Collegiate Athletic Association (Chen, Hailyn) (Filed on 4/12/2022)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Ariel Tal Teshuva as Counsel for Defendant the National Collegiate Athletic Association (Teshuva, Ariel) (Filed on 4/12/2022)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by April D. Youpee-Roll as Counsel for Defendant the National Collegiate Athletic Association (Youpee-Roll, April) (Filed on 4/12/2022)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO FORTHCOMING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by National Collegiate Athletic Association. (Luedtke, Carolyn) (Filed on 4/12/2022)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Certificate of Interested Entities by National Collegiate Athletic Association (Luedtke, Carolyn) (Filed on 4/12/2022)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke (Luedtke, Carolyn) (Filed on 4/12/2022)
April 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/9/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 6/2/2022. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Pers ons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry .) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2022)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 1. University of San Francisco served on 3/23/2022, answer due 4/13/2022. (Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/29/2022)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 1. National Collegiate Athletic Association served on 3/22/2022, answer due 4/12/2022. (Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/29/2022)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 1. Troy Nakamura served on 3/28/2022, answer due 4/18/2022. (Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/29/2022)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 1. Anthony N. Giarratano served on 3/22/2022, answer due 4/12/2022. (Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/29/2022)
March 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3.. (Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/25/2022)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #12 Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously. The court treats the motion as an administrative motion and grants it. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2022)
March 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #11 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Nigar A. Shaikh representing Plaintiffs. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2022)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Anonymously filed by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. Motion Hearing set for 4/21/2022 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 3/28/2022. Replies due by 4/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Proceed Anonymously, #2 Proposed Order)(Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/14/2022)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice as to Nigar A. Shaikh ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16990016.) filed by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. (Shaikh, Nigar) (Filed on 3/14/2022)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Lynn Ellenberger representing Plaintiffs. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2022)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Elizabeth A. Fegan representing Plaintiffs. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2022)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Lynn Ellenberger ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16989463.) filed by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. (Ellenberger, Lynn) (Filed on 3/14/2022)
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Elizabeth A. Fegan ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16989302.) filed by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3. (Fegan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 3/14/2022)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Anthony N. Giarratano, Troy Nakamura, National Collegiate Athletic Association, University of San Francisco. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2022)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/2/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/9/2022 11:00 AM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2022)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/25/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2022)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 (Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/11/2022)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/11/2022)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-16984202.). Filed byJohn Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 1. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Selbin, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/11/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe 1 et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony N. Giarratano
Represented By: Daniel A. Croley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Collegiate Athletic Association
Represented By: Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke
Represented By: April D. Youpee-Roll
Represented By: Ariel Tal Teshuva
Represented By: Brandon E. Martinez
Represented By: Hailyn Jennifer Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of San Francisco
Represented By: David Vincent Roth
Represented By: Jonathan M Baum
Represented By: Sonja Arndt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nino Giarratano
Represented By: Daniel A. Croley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Troy Nakamura
Represented By: Scott Brian Rapkin
Represented By: Michael Steven Rapkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 1
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Represented By: Jonathan David Selbin
Represented By: Lynn Ellenberger
Represented By: Michelle A. Lamy
Represented By: Nigar Shaikh
Represented By: Ling S. Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 2
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Represented By: Jonathan David Selbin
Represented By: Lynn Ellenberger
Represented By: Michelle A. Lamy
Represented By: Nigar Shaikh
Represented By: Ling S. Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 3
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Represented By: Jonathan David Selbin
Represented By: Lynn Ellenberger
Represented By: Michelle A. Lamy
Represented By: Nigar Shaikh
Represented By: Ling S. Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 4
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: john doe 5
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 6
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: john doe 7
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 8
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 9
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 10
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 11
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe 12
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Fegan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?