Young et al v. ByteDance Inc. et al
| Reece Young and Ashley Velez |
| ByteDance Inc. and TikTok Inc. |
| 3:2022cv01883 |
| March 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
Request for Judicial Notice re #16 MOTION to Dismiss Or Alternatively, to Compel Arbitration; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed byByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Doe v. YouTube Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Doe v. YouTube Order, #3 Exhibit C - Frazier v. ByteDance Complaint)(Related document(s) #16 ) (Blavin, Jonathan) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION to Dismiss Or Alternatively, to Compel Arbitration; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 6/23/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Vince Chhabria. Responses due by 6/2/2022. Replies due by 6/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration on Behalf of Telus International, #2 Exhibit 1 - Telus Arbitration Agreement, #3 Exhibit 2 - Telus 2021 Handbook, #4 Exhibit 3 - Velez Handbook Acknowledgement)(Blavin, Jonathan) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 04/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2022)
|
|
Filing 14
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2022)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Rose Leda Ehler on behalf of Defendants Bytedance Inc. and TikTok Inc. (Ehler, Rose) (Filed on 4/21/2022)
|
|
Filing 12
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc... (Blavin, Jonathan) (Filed on 4/20/2022)
|
|
Filing 11
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ashley Velez, Reece Young.. (Saveri, Joseph) (Filed on 4/8/2022)
|
|
Filing 10
CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 4/21/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2022)
|
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION re #1 Complaint (Extending Time for Defendants to Respond) filed by ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc.. (Blavin, Jonathan) (Filed on 4/7/2022)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Hugh Blavin for Defendant Bytedance Inc. And Tiktok Inc. (Blavin, Jonathan) (Filed on 4/7/2022)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Reece Young, Ashley Velez. TikTok Inc. served on 3/29/2022, answer due 4/19/2022. (Williams, Steven) (Filed on 3/31/2022)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Reece Young, Ashley Velez. ByteDance Inc. served on 3/29/2022, answer due 4/19/2022. (Williams, Steven) (Filed on 3/31/2022)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2022)
|
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 6/17/ 2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/24/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2022)
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/7/2022. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2022)
|
|
Filing 2
Proposed Summons. (Williams, Steven) (Filed on 3/24/2022)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BCANDC-17024945.). Filed byReece Young, Ashley Velez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Williams, Steven) (Filed on 3/24/2022)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
