Danzy v. MDG USA Inc.
| Tyisha Danzy |
| MDG USA Inc. |
| 3:2022cv01923 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #19 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Defendant MDG USA Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support ) filed byTyisha Danzy. (Dostart, Zachariah) (Filed on 5/20/2022) |
| Filing 23 REPLY (re #14 MOTION to Remand ) filed byTyisha Danzy. (Dostart, Zachariah) (Filed on 5/13/2022) |
| Filing 22 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING - Motion Hearing as to #14 Motion to Remand reset for 6/15/2022 02:00 PM to coincide with hearing set for #19 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. This proceeding will be held via Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/who General Order 58. Persons granted ac cess to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmd , COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2022) |
| Filing 21 Proposed Order re #19 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Defendant MDG USA Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support by MDG USA Inc.. (Theonugraha, Jonathan) (Filed on 5/6/2022) |
| Filing 20 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #14 MOTION to Remand ) Defendant MDG USA Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support filed byMDG USA Inc.. (Theonugraha, Jonathan) (Filed on 5/6/2022) |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Defendant MDG USA Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support filed by MDG USA Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 6/15/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Responses due by 5/20/2022. Replies due by 5/27/2022. (Theonugraha, Jonathan) (Filed on 5/6/2022) |
Filing 18
Order by Judge William H. Orrick granting #17 Motion for Pro Hac Vice by Gregory N. Blase. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2022)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17140160.) filed by MDG USA Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Blase, Gregory) (Filed on 5/3/2022) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) Answer and Affirmative Defenses by Defendant MDG USA Inc. byMDG USA Inc.. (Theonugraha, Jonathan) (Filed on 5/2/2022) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Address by Zachariah Paul Dostart (Dostart, Zachariah) (Filed on 4/28/2022) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Remand filed by Tyisha Danzy. Motion Hearing set for 6/1/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Responses due by 5/6/2022. Replies due by 5/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Dostart, Zachariah) (Filed on 4/22/2022) |
|
Filing 13
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 6/28/2022 02:00 PM via Videoconference. Case Management Statement due by 6/21/2022.Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/11/2022. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2022)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 4/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2022)
|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2022) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by MDG USA Inc... (Theonugraha, Jonathan) (Filed on 4/8/2022) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Tyisha Danzy (Dostart, Zachariah) (Filed on 3/31/2022) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MDG USA Inc. Defendant MDG USA Inc.'s Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 (Theonugraha, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/31/2022) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #6 Andrew C. Glass's Motion for admission Pro Hac Vice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2022)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Andrew C. Glass ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17043040.) filed by MDG USA Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Cert. of Good Standing)(Glass, Andrew) (Filed on 3/30/2022) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Tyisha Danzy of Change of Firm Name (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Dostart, Zachariah) (Filed on 3/30/2022) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to Complaint filed by MDG USA Inc.. (Theonugraha, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/29/2022) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/22/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/29/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2022) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/8/2022. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2022) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is 22CV007409. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17029992). Filed by MDG USA Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Theonugraha, Jonathan) (Filed on 3/25/2022) Modified on 3/31/2022 (dhm, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
