Woodall v. Monsanto Co
| Hobert Woodall |
| Monsanto Co. |
| 3:2022cv02104 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Co. identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Co.. [RE: Plaintiff Hobert Woodall] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 4/22/2022) |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Co. identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Co.. [RE: Plaintiff Hobert Woodall] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 4/22/2022) |
| Filing 6 Monsanto Company's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand [RE: Plaintiff Hobert Woodall] byMonsanto Co.. (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 4/22/2022) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Louisiana Western; Case Number 2:22-cv-00546. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 3:16-md-02741-VC; Western District of Louisana, 2:22-cv-00546 Woodall v. Monsanto Co, opened in California Northern District as 3:22-cv-02104 pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 320 cc: JPMDL (ecg-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2022) |
Filing 4
ORDER FOR MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER CTO # 320, directing transfer to Northern District of California, In Re: Roundup Products Liability Litigation, MDL # 2741. Record electronically transmitted to receiving court. Case Terminated. All future pleadings should be filed with the newly assigned court. (crt,Alexander, E)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE received via email from Clerk of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transmitting Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-320) in MDL No. 2741, IN RE: Roundup Products Liability Litigation advising case shall be transferred to the Northern District of California upon request of the record. (crt,Alexander, E) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Monsanto Co. (crt,Jones, P) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Co with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5009822) filed by Hobert Woodall. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Proposed summons/writ)(Attorney John C Enochs added to party Hobert Woodall(pty:pla))(aty,Enochs, John) Modified on 2/24/2022 to edit text (Jones, P). |
| CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Jones, P) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woodall v. Monsanto Co | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hobert Woodall | |
| Represented By: | John C. Enochs |
| Represented By: | Betsy J. Barnes |
| Represented By: | Richard Lee Root |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Co. | |
| Represented By: | Jennise Walker-Stubbs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
