Laborers International Union Local 261 v. City and County of San Francisco
| Laborers Local 261, Laborers International Union Local 261, Juan Rivera and Theresa Foglio-Ramirez |
| CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO |
| 3:2022cv02215 |
| April 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
REPLY (re #13 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byCity and County of San Francisco. (Yan, Matthew) (Filed on 5/27/2022)
|
|
Filing 17
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #13 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byTheresa Foglio-Ramirez, Laborers International Union Local 261, Juan Rivera. (Thigpen, Jordanna) (Filed on 5/20/2022)
|
|
Filing 16
CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the court resets the Motion Hearing #13 MOTION to Dismiss for 6/30/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. The briefing schedule remains the same. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2022)
|
|
Filing 15
STIPULATION re #13 MOTION to Dismiss Continuing Hearing Date filed by City and County of San Francisco. (Yan, Matthew) (Filed on 5/17/2022)
|
|
Filing 14
CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING: Motion Hearing #13 MOTION to Dismiss set for 6/16/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 7/7/2022 is reset to 8/18/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 8/11/2022. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Per sons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2022)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION to Dismiss filed by City and County of San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 6/16/2022 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 5/20/2022. Replies due by 5/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Yan, Matthew) (Filed on 5/6/2022)
|
|
Filing 12
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2022)
|
|
Filing 11
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Theresa Foglio-Ramirez, Laborers International Union Local 261, Juan Rivera.. (Veronese, Angela) (Filed on 4/20/2022)
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by City and County of San Francisco.. (Yan, Matthew) (Filed on 4/20/2022)
|
|
Filing 9
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer ) PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR RESPONDING TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed byTheresa Foglio-Ramirez, Laborers International Union Local 261, Juan Rivera. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Angela Alioto in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Enlarge Time for Responding to Plaintiffs' Complaint, #2 Declaration Declaration of Jordanna G. Thigpen in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Enlarge Time for Responding to Plaintiffs' Complaint, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Alioto Veronese, Angela) (Filed on 4/19/2022)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Jordanna Gabrielle Thigpen for Plaintiffs Laborers International Union Local 261, Theresa Foglio-Ramirez, Juan Rivera (Thigpen, Jordanna) (Filed on 4/15/2022)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by City and County of San Francisco. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF MATTHEW K. YAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR RESPONDING TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT, #2 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR RESPONDING TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT)(Yan, Matthew) (Filed on 4/15/2022)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Kaiho Yan (Yan, Matthew) (Filed on 4/13/2022)
|
|
Filing 5
Filing fee received from City and County of San Francisco: $ 402.00, receipt number 34611159171. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2022)
|
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/30/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/7/2022 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2022)
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/26/2022. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2022)
|
|
Filing 2
Civil Cover Sheet by CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO . (Rolnick, Jonathan) (Filed on 4/8/2022)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-21-596956. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 34611159171). Filed by CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service Certificate of Service)(Rolnick, Jonathan) (Filed on 4/8/2022) Modified on 4/12/2022 (jlg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
#Electronic filing error. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. Use October 2020 version which can be downloaded from https://cand.uscourts.gov/. No judge assignment will be made unti l the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2022)
|
|
#Electronic filing error. Filing fee not paid. Please pay the filing fee through Pay.gov by clicking on Civil > Other Documents > New Case Filing Fee in CM/ECF. [err701] Re:[ 1] Notice of Removal, filed by CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2022)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
