Johnson v. Bolanos et al
| Darrell Eugene Johnson |
| Carlos G. Bolanos, John W. Munsey, John Kovach, Doug Richardson and Shwiri W. Robinson |
| 3:2022cv02697 |
| May 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC AGB |
| James Donato |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 6/13/2022. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge by Darrell Eugene Johnson. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2022) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darrell Eugene Johnson. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Under The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (no process) against Carlos G. Bolanos, John Kovach, John W. Munsey, Doug Richardson, Shwiri W. Robinson, (Filing Fee: ifpp entered 5/5/2022). Filed by Darrell Eugene Johnson. (Attachments: #(1) Envelope) (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
