Ramirez v. Randstad HR Solutions DE, LLC et al
| Maria Guadalupe Gonzalez Ramirez |
| Randstad HR Solutions DE, LLC, COTY US LLC, HFC Prestige Products, Inc., Macy's Inc. and L'OREAL USA S/D, INC. |
| 3:2022cv02738 |
| May 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE SCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 8/11/2022 at 1:30 p.m. via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 12:00 p.m. on 8/10/2022.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2022) |
Filing 14
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 05/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2022)
|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2022) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by L'OREAL USA S/D, INC... (Vartabedian, Pamela) (Filed on 5/24/2022) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by COTY US LLC, HFC Prestige Products, Inc., Randstad HR Solutions DE, LLC.. (Schubert, Jill) (Filed on 5/20/2022) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jill L. Schubert (Schubert, Jill) (Filed on 5/17/2022) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony Joseph DeCristoforo (DeCristoforo, Anthony) (Filed on 5/17/2022) |
| Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Maria Guadalupe Gonzalez Ramirez. (Clapp, Joseph) (Filed on 5/11/2022) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Randstad HR Solutions DE, LLC of Court-Initiated Pleadings (DeCristoforo, Anthony) (Filed on 5/11/2022) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Randstad HR Solutions DE, LLC of Compliance w-28 USC 1446(d) (DeCristoforo, Anthony) (Filed on 5/11/2022) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/2/2022 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/9/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2022) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/24/2022. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2022) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Randstad HR Solutions DE, LLC (Schubert, Jill) (Filed on 5/6/2022) |
| Filing 2 Statement Corporate Disclosure by Randstad HR Solutions DE, LLC. (Schubert, Jill) (Filed on 5/6/2022) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is 22CV008944. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17154159). Filed byRandstad HR Solutions DE, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schubert, Jill) (Filed on 5/6/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
