Flores v. Accelerated Recovery Services, Inc.
Jorge Flores |
Accelerated Recovery Services, Inc. and DOE 1-5 |
3:2022cv02800 |
May 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Alex G Tse |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jorge Flores (Amador, Ramo) (Filed on 9/16/2022) |
Filing 11 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse: Plaintiff has notified the Court that the parties have reached a settlement and plaintiff anticipates filing a notice of dismissal with prejudice on or around September 20, 2022 #10 . Plaintiff shall have until September 26, 2022, to file a notice of dismissal. A status conference will be held on September 30, 2022, at 2:00 PM, if the notice of dismissal is not timely filed. All other currently set dates are vacated. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (agtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2022) |
Set/Reset Hearing Status Conference set for 9/30/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2022) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Jorge Flores (Amador, Ramo) (Filed on 8/4/2022) |
Filing 9 Acknowledgement of Receipt re #7 Summons Issued. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2022) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Upon Accelerated Recovery Services, Inc. served on 6/15/2022, answer due 7/6/2022. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Accelerated Recovery Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Form)(tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2022) |
Filing 6 Order by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse granting #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (agtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2022) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jorge Flores.. (Amador, Ramo) (Filed on 5/25/2022) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/5/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/12/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2022) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/26/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2022) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jorge Flores. (Amador, Ramo) (Filed on 5/11/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR: 1.) FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT (15 U.S.C. 1692 et seq.); 2.) ROSENTHAL FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT VIOLATIONS (Cal. Civ. Code 1788 et seq.); DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Accelerated Recovery Services, Inc.. Filed by Jorge Flores. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet, #(2) Proposed Summons)(Amador, Ramo) (Filed on 5/11/2022) Modified on 5/12/2022 (tn, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.