Context Directions LLC v. Fitbit, Inc.
| Context Directions LLC |
| Fitbit, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv02847 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice by Context Directions LLC (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 6/7/2022) |
| Filing 7 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding Patent Infringement (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2022) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Fitbit, Inc. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2022) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 8/16/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/23/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2022) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2022) |
| Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Context Directions LLC (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 5/13/2022) Modified on 5/16/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 5/13/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement; Jury Trial Demanded against Fitbit, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number ACANDC-17173103.). Filed by Context Directions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit) (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 5/13/2022) Modified on 5/16/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Context Directions LLC v. Fitbit, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Context Directions LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kirk J. Anderson |
| Represented By: | M. Grant McArthur |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fitbit, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
