Jackson v. Norris
Plaintiff: Lawrence Jackson
Defendant: Chief David Norris
Case Number: 3:2022cv03008
Filed: May 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Referring Judge: Joseph C Spero
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2022 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lawrence Jackson.. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2022)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 07/06/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/6/2022. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:drive for mailing on 7/6/2022.
July 5, 2022 Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE REVIEW UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Case Management Conference scheduled for August 26, 2022 is vacated. Any objection to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within 14 days of Plaintiff's receipt of this Report and Recommendation. THIS CASE SHALL BE REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT JUDGE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on July 5, 2022. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive for mailing on 7/6/2022 Modified on 7/6/2022 (klh, COURT STAFF).
July 5, 2022 Filing 6 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff Jackson shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 7/19/2022. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)copy placed in O:drive for mailing on 7/5/2022
June 13, 2022 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 6/27/2022. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive for mailing on 6/13/2022
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Plaintiff's response or amended complaint shall be filed by June 29, 2022.(jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)copy mailed 5/26/2022 Modified on 5/26/2022 (klh, COURT STAFF).
May 24, 2022 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/19/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/26/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
May 23, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lawrence Jackson. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2022)
May 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Norris. Filed byLawrence Jackson. Consent/Declination due by 6/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chief David Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?