Garrett v. Flannery et al
| Ashleigh Garrett |
| Jeff Flannery and Ginger Wellness, LLC |
| 3:2022cv03033 |
| May 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice to Adverse Party and to Superior Court of Removal of Action to Federal Court by Jeff Flannery and Ginger Wellness, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A ISO of Certificate of Service)(Spencer, Nicholas) (Filed on 6/14/2022) Modified on 6/15/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jeff Flannery.. (Spencer, Nicholas) (Filed on 6/6/2022) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ashleigh Garrett.. (Kuchinsky, Alexei) (Filed on 5/25/2022) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/19/202 2. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/26/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2022) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/6/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2022) |
| Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint (see Exhibit G and H of Removal Complaint) byJeff Flannery, Ginger Wellness, LLC. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2022) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jeff Flannery re 1 Notice of Removal, (Spencer, Nicholas) (Filed on 5/23/2022) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Jeff Flannery re 1 Notice of Removal, Defendants Jeff Flannery and Ginger Wellness, LLC's Notice of Interested Parties (Spencer, Nicholas) (Filed on 5/23/2022) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving or Proceeding by Jeff Flannery (Spencer, Nicholas) (Filed on 5/23/2022) Text Modified on 5/24/2022 conforming to Filed Document Caption, Incorrect Event used at case opening.(bw, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ginger Wellness, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Ginger Wellness, LLC for Ginger Wellness, LLC. re 1 Notice of Removal, (Spencer, Nicholas) (Filed on 5/23/2022) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Alameda. Their case number is 22CV009673. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17201858). Filed byJeff Flannery. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Spencer, Nicholas) (Filed on 5/23/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
