Heresniak v. Musk et al
William Heresniak |
Elon R Musk, Twitter, Inc., X Holdings I, Inc. and X Holding II, Inc. |
3:2022cv03074 |
May 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Sallie Kim |
Stockholders Suits |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Heresniak. X Holding II, Inc. served on 7/13/2022, answer due 8/3/2022. (Molumphy, Mark) (Filed on 7/18/2022) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Heresniak. X Holdings I, Inc. served on 7/13/2022, answer due 8/3/2022. (Molumphy, Mark) (Filed on 7/18/2022) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by William Heresniak. Service waived by Elon R Musk waiver sent on 7/11/2022, answer due 9/9/2022. (Molumphy, Mark) (Filed on 7/15/2022) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Heresniak. Twitter, Inc. served on 7/11/2022, answer due 8/1/2022. (Molumphy, Mark) (Filed on 7/14/2022) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to X Holding II, Inc., X Holdings I, Inc. as to Amended Complaint. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2022) |
Filing 9 Proposed Summons. (Murphy, Anne Marie) (Filed on 7/11/2022) |
Filing 8 Proposed Summons. (Murphy, Anne Marie) (Filed on 7/11/2022) |
#Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #8 Proposed Summons filed by William Heresniak. Summon s previously issued to Defendants Twitter, Inc. and Elon R. Musk (See dkt #4 ). This summons will need to be filed as Summons returned unexecuted before another summons can be issued for these defendants. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2022) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint against Elon R Musk, Twitter, Inc.. Filed byWilliam Heresniak. (Murphy, Anne Marie) (Filed on 7/1/2022) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by William Heresniak.. (Redenbarger, Tyson) (Filed on 6/8/2022) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/22/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/29/2022 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2022) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Elon R Musk, Twitter, Inc. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2022) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/8/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2022) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Murphy, Anne Marie) (Filed on 5/25/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for (1) Violation of the California Corporations Code; and (2) Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against Elon R Musk, Twitter, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17210457.). Filed byWilliam Heresniak. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Murphy, Anne Marie) (Filed on 5/25/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.