Cornell v. Monsanto Company
Plaintiff: William Cornell
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Case Number: 3:2022cv03139
Filed: May 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2022 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff William Cornell] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 6/28/2022)
June 28, 2022 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff William Cornell] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 6/28/2022)
June 28, 2022 Filing 6 Defendant Monsanto Company's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand [RE: Plaintiff William Cornell] byMonsanto Company. (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 6/28/2022)
May 27, 2022 Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Florida Southern; Case Number 2:22-cv-14167. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
May 27, 2022 MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2741: Southern District of Florida, 2:22-cv-14167-AMC, Cornell v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:22-cv-03139-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 331 cc: JPMDL (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2022)
May 25, 2022 Filing 4 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-331) transferring case to the Northern District of California re: MDL 2741 for consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 USC 1407 and assigned to the Honorable Honorable Vince Chhabria. (Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel). (pes)
May 25, 2022 Civil Case Terminated per DE #4 . Closing Case. (pes)
May 12, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (mee)
May 12, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee)
May 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15632152, filed by William Cornell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Cohen, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cornell v. Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Cornell
Represented By: Jonathan Betten Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Represented By: Jennise Walker-Stubbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?