Sheppard et al v. Compass, Inc. et al
| Lisa Sheppard and Todd Sheppard |
| Compass, Inc., Compass California, Inc. a Corporation doing business as Compass, Compass California II, Inc. a Corporation doing business as Compass and Compass California III, Inc. a Corporation doing business as Compass |
| 3:2022cv03237 |
| June 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 REPLY (re #11 MOTION to Remand Action to State Court ) filed byLisa Sheppard, Todd Sheppard. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Patricio Barrera)(Barrera, Patricio) (Filed on 7/22/2022) |
| Filing 17 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #11 MOTION to Remand Action to State Court ) to Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion to Remand Action to State Court filed byCompass California II, Inc., Compass California III, Inc., Compass California, Inc., Compass, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration David Szwarcsztejn)(Szwarcsztejn, Alejandro) (Filed on 7/15/2022) |
| Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING. Please take notice that the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand #11 is reset to August 31, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley by a Zoom webinar. Pursuant to L.R. 7-7(d), the briefing schedule will remain the same. Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration #9 is stayed pending the hearing on the Motion to Remand. The initial case management conference will be rescheduled after the motion to remand is decided.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Co urt Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon on 8/30/2022.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text -only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2022) |
Filing 15
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 07/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2022)
|
| Filing 14 **ERRONEOUS ENTRY, SEE REVISED ENTRY AT DOCKET NO. #15 ** ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Signed by The Clerk on 07/13/2022. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2022) Modified on 7/13/2022 (jrs, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2022) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/12/2022. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2022) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Remand Action to State Court; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Lisa Sheppard, Todd Sheppard. Motion Hearing set for 8/18/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Responses due by 7/15/2022. Replies due by 7/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Patricio T.D. Barrera) (Barrera, Patricio) (Filed on 7/1/2022) Modified on 7/1/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lisa Sheppard, Todd Sheppard.. (Barrera, Patricio) (Filed on 7/1/2022) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Compass California II, Inc., Compass California III, Inc., Compass California, Inc., Compass, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 9/15/2022 01:30 PM in Do Not Use Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Responses due by 7/14/2022. Replies due by 7/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points & Authorities, #2 Declaration of Kathy Mehringer & Exh's 1-7, #3 Declaration of Graham M. Helm, #4 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Compel Arbitration, #5 Request for Judicial Notice, #6 Proposed Order Granting Request for Judicial Notice)(Helm, Graham) (Filed on 6/30/2022) Modified on 7/1/2022 (kmg, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 SECOND JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT re #6 Stipulation, filed by Compass California II, Inc., Compass California III, Inc., Compass California, Inc., Compass, Inc., Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class (Helm, Graham) (Filed on 6/22/2022) Modified on 6/22/2022 (ecg, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 7/1/2022. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2022) |
| Filing 6 JOINT STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Compass California II, Inc., Compass California III, Inc., Compass California, Inc., Compass, Inc.. (Szwarcsztejn, Alejandro) (Filed on 6/9/2022) Modified on 6/10/2022 (kmg, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Compass California II, Inc., Compass California III, Inc., Compass California, Inc., Compass, Inc. re 3 Case Assigned by Intake,, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, #4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines,, #1 Notice of Removal,, (Helm, Graham) (Filed on 6/3/2022) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/30/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/6/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2022) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/16/2022. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2022) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Compass California II, Inc., Compass California III, Inc., Compass California, Inc., Compass, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Compass, Inc. for Compass California II, Inc., Compass California III, Inc., Compass California, Inc.. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Helm, Graham) (Filed on 6/2/2022) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Civil Action from Sonoma County Superior Court. Their case number is SCV-268304. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number ACANDC-17231772). Filed by Compass California III, Inc., Compass California, Inc., Compass, Inc., Compass California II, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Declaration of Graham M. Helm, #6 Declaration of Rory Golod) (Helm, Graham) (Filed on 6/2/2022) Modified on 6/2/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
