Kershaw, Cook & Talley PC v. Nelson National Law Firm, LLC Group
Kershaw, Cook & Talley PC |
Nelson National Law Firm, LLC dba Nelson National Law Group and Nelson National Law Firm an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Nelson National Law Group |
3:2022cv03432 |
June 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Alex G Tse |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Kershaw, Cook & Talley PC.. (Dreher, Jamie) (Filed on 6/24/2022) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/2/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/9/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2022) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/24/2022. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2022) |
Filing 1 (No Process) COMPLAINT with Jury Demand for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief against Nelson National Law Firm, LLC dba Nelson National Law Group ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17253869.). Filed by Kershaw, Cook & Talley PC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dreher, Jamie) (Filed on 6/10/2022) Modified on 6/13/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kershaw, Cook & Talley PC v. Nelson National Law Firm, LLC Group | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kershaw, Cook & Talley PC | |
Represented By: | Jamie Paul Dreher |
Represented By: | Sherry Hartel Haus |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nelson National Law Firm, LLC dba Nelson National Law Group | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nelson National Law Firm an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Nelson National Law Group | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.