Karl v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al
| James Karl |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., Zimmer US, Inc., Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC, Biomet Biologics, LLC, Biomet, Inc. and Donald Quigley |
| 3:2022cv03435 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William Alsup |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 REPLY (re #15 MOTION to Remand and for Costs ) filed byJames Karl. (Jaret, Robert) (Filed on 7/14/2022) |
| Filing 23 REPLY (re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof ) filed byZimmer US, Inc.. (Kapoor, Roshni) (Filed on 7/7/2022) |
| Filing 22 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #15 MOTION to Remand and for Costs ) filed byZimmer US, Inc.. (Kapoor, Roshni) (Filed on 7/7/2022) |
| Filing 21 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof ) filed byJames Karl. (Attachments: #1 Opposition to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Proposed Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss)(Jaret, Robert) (Filed on 6/30/2022) |
| Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING #12 #15 MOTION HEARINGS AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO 9/22/2022 AT 8:00AM: Hearing re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, #15 MOTION to Remand and for Costs and Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/22/2022 08:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/15/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2022) |
Filing 19
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William Alsup for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 06/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2022)
|
| Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2022) |
| Filing 17 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by James Karl.. (Jaret, Robert) (Filed on 6/24/2022) |
| Filing 16 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Zimmer US, Inc... (Kapoor, Roshni) (Filed on 6/24/2022) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Remand and for Costs filed by James Karl. Motion Hearing set for 8/4/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Responses due by 7/7/2022. Replies due by 7/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Remand, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Jaret, Robert) (Filed on 6/23/2022) |
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: All parties shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 6/28/2022. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
| Filing 13 Request for Judicial Notice re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed byZimmer US, Inc.. (Related document(s) #12 ) (Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 6/17/2022) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Zimmer US, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 8/4/2022 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Responses due by 7/1/2022. Replies due by 7/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 6/17/2022) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore Granting #8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2022)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore Granting #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/15/2022. (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2022)
|
|
Filing 9
***DISREGARD. ERROR IN FILING. SEE DOCKET NO. #10 ***ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore Granting #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2022) Modified on 6/15/2022 (amg, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17265007.) filed by Zimmer US, Inc.. (Fleming, Liza) (Filed on 6/14/2022) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17264988.) filed by Zimmer US, Inc.. (Brown, Troy) (Filed on 6/14/2022) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 9/6/2022 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/13/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2022) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Zimmer US, Inc. (Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 6/10/2022) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/24/2022. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2022) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Zimmer US, Inc. (Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 6/10/2022) |
| Filing 2 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Zimmer US, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. for Zimmer US, Inc.. (Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 6/10/2022) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marin County Superior. Their case number is CIV2201089. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17254290). Filed byZimmer US, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 6/10/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
