CraftShack, Inc. v. Royal Liquor et al
| CraftShack, Inc. |
| Royal Liquor, City Hive, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10 |
| 3:2022cv03533 |
| June 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Alex G Tse |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Order by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse granting #12 stipulation to extend time to respond to first amended complaint. (agtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2022)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to extend Defendants' deadline to respond to #11 Amended Complaint filed by City Hive, Inc., CraftShack, Inc. (Norberg, Jeffrey) (Filed on 8/2/2022) Modified on 8/2/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against City Hive, Inc., Royal Liquor. Filed by CraftShack, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit B to Complaint)(Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 7/19/2022) Modified on 7/19/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 10 Stipulation extending City Hive Inc.,'s time to respond to Complaint; response now due August 15, 2022 filed by City Hive, Inc., CraftShack, Inc. (Norberg, Jeffrey) (Filed on 7/14/2022) Modified on 7/15/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CraftShack, Inc.. City Hive, Inc. served on 6/23/2022, answer due 7/14/2022. (Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 6/23/2022) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CraftShack, Inc.. Royal Liquor served on 6/21/2022, answer due 7/12/2022. (Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 6/22/2022) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/9/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/16/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2022) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to City Hive, Inc., Royal Liquor. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2022) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/29/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2022) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 6/15/2022) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a Copyright (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 6/15/2022) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by CraftShack, Inc. (Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 6/15/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against City Hive, Inc., Royal Liquor (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17268456). Filed by CraftShack, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit B to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 6/15/2022) Modified on 6/16/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
