Maciel et al v. M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.
| Ignacio Maciel and Ruth Torres |
| M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv03885 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Clerk's Letter of Remand: Certified copies of Remand Order and Docket mailed to San Francisco Superior Court. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2022) |
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #7 Motion to Remand. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2022)
|
| Filing 19 OBJECTIONS to re #18 Opposition/Response to Motion,,, by Ignacio Maciel, Ruth Torres. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Righetti, Matthew) (Filed on 10/20/2022) |
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #7 MOTION to Remand ) Defendant M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc.'s Sur-Reply in Support of Its Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand filed byM.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Supplemental Declaration of Kathy H. Gao in Support of Defendant M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc.'s Sur-Reply in Support of Its Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, #2 Declaration Declaration of Amber Miller in Support of Defendant M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc.'s Sur-Reply in Support of Its Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, #3 Declaration Declaration of Charli Smithwick in Support of Defendant M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc.'s Sur-Reply in Support of Its Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, #4 Declaration Declaration of Nakoh Holloway in Support of Defendant M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc.'s Sur-Reply in Support of Its Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand)(Gao, Kathy) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/11/2022. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2022)
|
| Filing 16 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley: Motion Hearing held and recorded by Zoom videoconference on 9/29/2022 on #7 Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. The motion was argued, submitted, and taken under submission. ( Digital Recording Time: 9:14-9:31)Attorneys for Plaintiffs: John Glugoski/Reuben NathanAttorney for Defendant: Kathy Gao (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 9/29/2022) |
| Filing 15 REPLY (re #7 MOTION to Remand ) filed byIgnacio Maciel, Ruth Torres. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Ignacio Maciel, #2 Declaration of Ruth Torres, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Righetti, Matthew) (Filed on 9/15/2022) |
| Filing 14 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Glugoski, John) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #7 MOTION to Remand ) filed byM.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Gao Declaration ISO Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand)(Gao, Kathy) (Filed on 9/1/2022) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #11 Stipulation to Set Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2022)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Remand . Responses due by 9/1/2022. Replies due by 9/15/2022. The Motion Hearing is reset for 9/29/2022 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is requi red of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon on 9/28/2022.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2022) |
| Filing 11 JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Set Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand filed by M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.. (Gao, Kathy) (Filed on 8/5/2022) Modified on 8/8/2022 (kmg, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 10 Re-notice motion hearing re #7 MOTION to Remand filed by Ignacio Maciel, Ruth Torres. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Related document(s) #7 ) (Righetti, Matthew) (Filed on 8/2/2022) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 08/02/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2022)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2022) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand filed by Ignacio Maciel, Ruth Torres. Motion Hearing set for 9/2/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Responses due by 8/12/2022. Replies due by 8/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of John Glugoski In Support Of Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, #2 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Righetti, Matthew) (Filed on 7/29/2022) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc... (Gao, Kathy) (Filed on 7/15/2022) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ignacio Maciel.. (Righetti, Matthew) (Filed on 7/13/2022) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - ORDER Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Notice of Case Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge for Trial, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Standing ORDER for Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse)(Gao, Kathy) (Filed on 7/6/2022) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 9/23/202 2. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/30/2022 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2022) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/15/2022. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2022) |
| Answer to Removal Complaint (Refer to Document 1-2) by M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2022) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-22-599387. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17314168). Filed byM.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - State Court Answer to Unverified Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Declaration Declaration of Lacey Moore ISO Defendant, #5 Certificate/Proof of Service M.A.C. Cosmetic's Certification of Interested Parties)(Gao, Kathy) (Filed on 6/30/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
