Smith et al v. Kelly Aboudara
Plaintiff: Jason H Smith and Apogee Garden Products
Defendant: Kelley Aboudara and Mark Maystrovich
Case Number: 3:2022cv03907
Filed: July 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: William Alsup
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2022 Filing 19 STIPULATION per FRCP 41 for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Apogee Garden Products. (Nick, J.) (Filed on 10/1/2022)
October 1, 2022 Filing 18 STIPULATION per FRCP 41 for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Jason H Smith. (Nick, J.) (Filed on 10/1/2022)
September 23, 2022 Filing 17 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Nick, J.) (Filed on 9/23/2022)
September 23, 2022 Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: #14 #15 : No hearings or deadlines will be vacated until final settlement has been filed. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2022)
September 23, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement of Case; Request to Retain Jurisdiction Until Dismissal Filed by Apogee Garden Products (Nick, J.) (Filed on 9/23/2022)
September 23, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement of Case; Request to Retain Jurisdiction until Dismissal Filed by Jason H Smith (Nick, J.) (Filed on 9/23/2022)
September 23, 2022 Filing 13 ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2022)
August 4, 2022 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Kelley Aboudara, Mark Maystrovich. (Abel, Adam) (Filed on 8/4/2022) Modified on 8/5/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF).
July 29, 2022 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE SCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/13/2022 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/6/2022. Standing orders can be downloaded from the Court's webpage at www.cand.uscourts.gov/whaorders. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2022)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William Alsup for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 07/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2022)
July 26, 2022 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2022).
July 26, 2022 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jason H Smith.. (Nick, J.) (Filed on 7/26/2022)
July 22, 2022 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFFS Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/5/2022. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2022)
July 11, 2022 Filing 6 Refund Status re #2 Application for Refund Approved. (rgh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2022)
July 5, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kelley Aboudara, Mark Maystrovich. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2022)
July 5, 2022 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/28/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/5/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2022)
July 5, 2022 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/19/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2022)
July 1, 2022 Filing 2 Application for Refund, Receipt Number ACANDC-17318132 by Jason H Smith. (Nick, J.) (Filed on 7/1/2022)
July 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages; Jury Trial Demanded against Kelley Aboudara, Mark Maystrovich (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number ACANDC-17318264.). Filed by Jason H Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Nick, J.) (Filed on 7/1/2022) Modified on 7/5/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith et al v. Kelly Aboudara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason H Smith
Represented By: J. David Nick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Apogee Garden Products
Represented By: J. David Nick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelley Aboudara
Represented By: Adam Scott Abel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Maystrovich
Represented By: Adam Scott Abel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?