Kennedy v. Lincare Holdings Inc.
| CHARLENE KENNEDY |
| LINCARE HOLDINGS INC., and Lincare Holdings Inc. |
| 4:2022cv03974 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Alyssa M. Engstrom Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Engstrom, Alyssa) (Filed on 9/2/2022) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation for Further Extension of Time for Defendant Lincare Holdings Inc. to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Lincare Holdings Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Engstrom, Alyssa) (Filed on 8/29/2022) |
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. DENYING #16 Administrative Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2022)
|
| Filing 16 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Additional Pages for Motion to Dismiss , MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages filed by Lincare Holdings Inc.. Responses due by 8/29/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Alyssa M. Engstrom ISO Motion for Leave for Page Extension, #2 Exhibit A to the Declaration of Alyssa M. Engstrom, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Engstrom, Alyssa) (Filed on 8/25/2022) |
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for October 11, 2022, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by October 4th. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:22-cv-03974-HSG. The October 11th proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Signed by The Clerk on 08/10/2022. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2022)
|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2022) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lincare Holdings Inc... (Hurst, Wesley) (Filed on 8/9/2022) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE TO DEFENDANT Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/16/2022. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2022) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Noel Scott Cohen Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (Cohen, Noel) (Filed on 8/2/2022) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Wesley Douglas Hurst (Hurst, Wesley) (Filed on 8/2/2022) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Entities by Lincare Holdings Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Linde North America Holdings Ltd. for Lincare Holdings Inc.. (Cohen, Noel) (Filed on 8/1/2022) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint Stipulation For Extension Of Time For Defendant Lincare Holdings, Inc. To Respond To Plaintiffs Complaint filed by Lincare Holdings Inc.. (Cohen, Noel) (Filed on 8/1/2022) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Charlene Kennedy.. (Cole, Scott) (Filed on 7/19/2022) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Lincare Holdings Inc. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2022) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Cole, Scott) (Filed on 7/7/2022) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/28/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/5/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2022) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]. The summons should be uploaded separately and not as part of, or as an attachment to, the complaint or other initiatin g documents.This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety as Proposed Summons. Re:[1-2] Summons filed by Charlene Kennedy (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2022) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/20/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT CHARLENE KENNEDY against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17328269.). Filed byCHARLENE KENNEDY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Cole, Scott) (Filed on 7/6/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
