Osage Nation of Oklahoma v. McKinsey & Company Inc. et al
| Osage Nation of Oklahoma |
| McKinsey & Company Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company Inc. Washington D.C., Publicis Health, LLC, Practice Fusion, Inc., Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and ZS Associates, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv03994 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE terminating deadlines set by #5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. The filing at docket #5 was made in error. The associated deadlines have been terminated. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2022) |
| Filing 5 FILED IN ERROR. IGNORE. Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 9/30/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/7/2022 08:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2022) Modified on 7/11/2022 (wsn, COURT STAFF). |
| DIRECT FILED MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2996: Opened in California Northern District as 3:22-cv-03994-CRB Osage Nation of Oklahoma v. McKinsey & Company Inc. et al cc: JPMDL (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2022) |
| Filing 4 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Unredacted Original Complaint filed by Osage Nation of Oklahoma. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Curtis Bruehl, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit Unredacted Original Complaint)(Browne, Matthew) (Filed on 7/8/2022) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Osage Nation of Oklahoma Corrected Civil Cover Sheet. (Browne, Matthew) (Filed on 7/8/2022) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17333619.). Filed byOsage Nation of Oklahoma. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Browne, Matthew) (Filed on 7/8/2022) |
| Electronic Filing Error: Case has been randomly assigned to judge, however incorrect Civil Cover Sheet CAND 44 (Rev. 04/21) used at case opening. Please complete and re-file as a separate docket entry correct Civil Cover Sheet JS-CAND 44 (Rev. 10/20) re: #1 . #1 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Osage Nation of Oklahoma (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
