Mizar v. indiGO San Francisco, LLC
Plaintiff: Robert Mizar
Defendant: indiGO San Francisco, LLC
Case Number: 3:2022cv04033
Filed: July 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2022 Filing 19 REPLY (re #8 MOTION to Compel Individual Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Proceedings) filed by indiGO San Francisco, LLC. (Davila, Cameron) (Filed on 8/5/2022) Modified on 8/8/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF).
July 29, 2022 Filing 18 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #8 MOTION to Compel Individual Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Proceedings ) filed byRobert Mizar. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Lisa L. Bradner)(Bradner, Lisa) (Filed on 7/29/2022)
July 27, 2022 Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING MOTION HEARING. Due to the Court's unavailability, the hearing on Defendant's #8 Motion to Compel Individual Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Proceedings set for September 8, 2022 is continued to September 15, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley via a Zoom webinar. Pursuant to L.R. 7-7(d), the briefing schedule will remain the same.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon on September 14, 2022.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAF F) (Filed on 7/27/2022)
July 19, 2022 Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference is set for 10/6/2022 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Corley via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon on 10/5/2022.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2022)
July 19, 2022 Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING DATE. The hearing on Defendant's #8 Motion to Compel Individual Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Proceedings is reset to 9/8/2022 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearance s: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon on 9/7/2022.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/ 19/2022)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 07/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2022)
July 19, 2022 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2022)
July 19, 2022 Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Robert Mizar.. (Bradner, Lisa) (Filed on 7/19/2022)
July 18, 2022 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by indiGO San Francisco, LLC.. (Davila, Cameron) (Filed on 7/18/2022)
July 18, 2022 Filing 10 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Motion Hearing #8 MOTION to Compel Individual Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Proceedings set for 8/25/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.us courts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the c ourt. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2022)
July 15, 2022 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/22/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2022)
July 15, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to Compel Individual Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Proceedings filed by indiGO San Francisco, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 8/25/2022 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 7/29/2022. Replies due by 8/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Ps & As in Support, #2 Declaration of Chelsey Dunn in Support, #3 Declaration of Timothy J. Murphy in Support, #4 Declaration of Danielle H. Moore in Support, #5 Declaration of Adam F. Sloustcher in Support, #6 Declaration of Cameron J. Davila in Support, #7 Proposed Order)(Davila, Cameron) (Filed on 7/15/2022) Modified on 7/18/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF).
July 14, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by indiGO San Francisco, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, re new case docs per Local Rule 4-2 (Davila, Cameron) (Filed on 7/14/2022)
July 11, 2022 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 9/29/202 2. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/6/2022 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2022)
July 8, 2022 Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/22/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2022)
July 8, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding by indiGO San Francisco, LLC. (Davila, Cameron) (Filed on 7/8/2022) Modified on 7/11/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF).
July 8, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by indiGO San Francisco, LLC identifying Other Affiliate indiGO San Francisco, LLC for indiGO San Francisco, LLC. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Davila, Cameron) (Filed on 7/8/2022)
July 8, 2022 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by indiGO San Francisco, LLC identifying Corporate Parent indiGO San Francisco, LLC, Other Affiliate indiGO Auto Group California, LLC, Other Affiliate indiGO Auto Group Holdings, LLC, Other Affiliate Pon Luxury Cars North America, Inc. for indiGO San Francisco, LLC. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Davila, Cameron) (Filed on 7/8/2022)
July 8, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (with jury demand by plaintiff) from Marin Superior Court. Their case number is CIV2201676. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17336191). Filed by indiGO San Francisco, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of John Upchurch, #3 Declaration of Adam F. Sloustcher)(Davila, Cameron) (Filed on 7/8/2022) Modified on 7/11/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mizar v. indiGO San Francisco, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Mizar
Represented By: Kent L Bradbury
Represented By: Lisa Ludlow Bradner
Represented By: Timothy Brian Del Castillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: indiGO San Francisco, LLC
Represented By: Cameron J. Davila
Represented By: Adam Frank Sloustcher
Represented By: Danielle Hultenius Moore
Represented By: Timothy Joseph Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?