Capesius v. Monsanto Company
| Gregory Capesius |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2022cv04177 |
| July 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Genevieve M Zimmerman (Zimmerman, Genevieve) (Filed on 9/15/2022) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff Gregory Capesius] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 8/5/2022) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff Gregory Capesius] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 8/5/2022) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand [RE: Plaintiff Gregory Capesius] by Monsanto Company. (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 8/5/2022) Modified on 8/7/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Iowa Northern; Case Number 5:22-cv-04033. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 3 CERTIFIED CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 341) MDL No. 2741. This action is transferred to USDC Northern District of California and assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. Signed by John W Nichols, Clerk of the Panel on 7/15/2022. (Case electronically transferred to USDC Northern District of California) (des) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED re MDL 2741: From Northern District of Iowa, 5:22cv04033, Capesius v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:22-cv-04177-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 341 cc: JPMDL (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2022) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. ****PLEASE MAKE COPIES OF SUMMONS FOR EACH DEFENDANT AND FILL IN REMAINING INFORMATION**** (Attachments: #1 Civil Actions new case packet) (des) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT And Demand For Jury Trial against Monsanto Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number AIANDC-3701749) filed by Gregory Capesius. Scheduling Report due by 9/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (docketed by clerk pursuant to attorney failing to complete the complaint process) (des) |
| Judge Linda R Reade and Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney added. No conflicts identified. (des) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Capesius v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gregory Capesius | |
| Represented By: | Larry F Woods |
| Represented By: | Genevieve M Zimmerman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Represented By: | Jennise Walker-Stubbs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
